Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top


I am trying to find the bound of this sequence.But I get stuck after some computations. I take $\sin f(x)\leq|f(x)| $ and $|\cos(x)|\leq1$ but I am not sure what to do at the end.Wasted 10 papers.

share|cite|improve this question
what about using $|cos(n)|\leq 1$ and $|\sin(\cdot)|\leq 1$? By "the bound of this sequence," do you mean the limit? – Michael Sep 4 '14 at 6:42
then i get $\frac{n+1}{n^2}$ all examples I have seen are basic. – GorillaApe Sep 4 '14 at 6:45
I am confused: Do you not like $(n+1)/n^2$ for some reason? It is not really clear what you are looking for. – Michael Sep 4 '14 at 6:50
I dont know how to find the bound from that – GorillaApe Sep 4 '14 at 6:52
So, you don't like $(n+1)/n^2$ because it is not a real number? Then you should find a real number that is greater than that, for all $n \in \{1, 2, 3, \ldots\}$. – Michael Sep 4 '14 at 6:56

When $n$ gets large so does $n^2+2n-5$. Since we don't have much control over $\cos x$ and $\sin x$ when $x$ is large we have to face the possibility that $\cos n$ and $\sin(n^2+2n-5)$ both are near $\pm1$ at the same time for certain large $n$. It follows that the best "universal" estimate is $$|a_n|\leq{n+1\over n^2}\qquad(n\geq1)\ .$$

share|cite|improve this answer
Very nice results! – mike Sep 4 '14 at 8:48

Here is a plot of Christian Blatter's bounds $\pm (n+1)/n^2$ and $a_n$: enter image description here

I posted a new MSE question here about the convergence of series $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n$.

share|cite|improve this answer
so it is correct to say that $|a_n|<1$ (boundary) – GorillaApe Sep 4 '14 at 10:39

Alex's suggestion that the sequence is bounded by zero is incorrect. The graph disproves this.

Kelenner's suggestion is at best confusing. He needs absolute values in multiple places. His recursive case has not been proven.
m seems to serve two different purposes- i. a_n≥ m but later ii. a_m> 0

Feel free to edit with LaTeX, etc.

share|cite|improve this answer

Compute first $a_1$. I have found $a_1=-0,3689...$. Now use $|a_n|\leq \frac{n+1}{n^2}\leq \frac{2}{n}$. We have $\frac{2}{n}<0,3689...$ for $n\geq 6$. Hence, for $n\geq 6$, we have $a_n>a_1$. Now you see that if $m$ is the minimum of $a_k$, $k=1,2,3,4,5$, we have $a_n\geq m$ for all $n$, and there exists $k\leq 5$ such that $a_k=m$. Hence $m$ is the lower bound you want.

For the upper bound, compute $a_2,a_3,a_4,a_5,...$ and find a $m$ such that $a_m>0$, and use the same way of proof.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.