Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

a few days ago, I tried to solve this problem

Let $f\colon \mathbb{R}_{+} \to \mathbb{R}$ uniformly continuous. Prove that exists $K>0$ such that for each $x\in \mathbb{R}_{+},$ $$\sup_{w>0}\{ |f(x+w) -f(w)|\}\le K \,\, ( x + 1).$$

and some members of this community have suggested that road :

  1. Let $F\colon\mathbb R_+\to\mathbb R$ defined by $\displaystyle F(x)=\sup_{t>0}|f(x+t)-f(x)|$. Show that $F$ is uniformly continuous on $\mathbb R$.
  2. Let $h\colon \mathbb R_+\to\mathbb R_+$ an uniformly continuous function on $\mathbb R_+$. Prove that we can find a constant $K>0$ such that $h(x)\leq K(x+1)$ for all $x\geq 0$.
  3. Conclude.

I tried, only step 1,but I do not know how to continue

$$|f(x_1+w) -f(w)- f(x_2+w) +f(w)|=$$ $|f(x_1+w)|- |f(x_2+w)|\leq|f(x_1+w)- f(x_2+w)|\leq K(x+1)<\varepsilon $

if I take $\varepsilon=1$

$|f(x_1+w)|- |f(x_2+w)|\leq K(x+1)<1$ .... ..... .....

share|cite|improve this question
possible duplicate of Problem with this question : uniformly continuous – Did Dec 14 '11 at 14:38
It is the exact duplicate indeed... May I suggest to close the other thread, for it has no answer? – Pacciu Dec 14 '11 at 16:27
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The problem can be solved as follows.

If you choose $\varepsilon =1$ in the definition of uniform continuity, you gain a $\delta \in ]0,1]$ s.t. for all $a,b >0$: $$\tag{1} |a-b|\leq \delta \quad \Rightarrow \quad |f(a)-f(b)|\leq 1\; .$$ Now, fix $x>0$: since $\mathbb{R}$ has the Archimedean property, there exists $N\in \mathbb{N}$ s.t.: $$\tag{2} N\delta \leq x\leq (N+1)\delta \; ;$$ hence split the interval $[w,x+w]$ into $N+1$ subintervals using the $N+2$ points: $$w_k:=w+k\ \delta \qquad \text{for } k=0,\ldots ,N;\quad w_{N+1}:=x+w$$ and write: $$\tag{3} |f(x+w)-f(w)|\leq \sum_{k=0}^N|f(w_k)-f(w_{k+1})|\; ;$$ at this stage, (1) can be used to increase the RHside of (3): $$|f(x+w)-f(w)| \leq N+1$$ and (2) yields: $$\tag{4} |f(x+w)-f(w)| \leq \frac{1}{\delta}\ x+1\; ;$$ finally from $0<\delta \leq 1$ and (4) you get: $$|f(x+w)-f(w)| \leq \frac{1}{\delta}\ (x+1)\; ,$$ which is your claim with $K=1/\delta$.

share|cite|improve this answer
A remark. For $h>0$, let $u^h:]0,\infty [\ni x\mapsto u(x+h)\in \mathbb{R}$ be the $h$-translate of $u$; hence $\sup_{x>0} |u(x+h)-u(x)|\leq M\ (h+1)$ recasts as an estimate of the $\infty$-distance from $u^h$ to $u$ in terms of the length of the translation via a constant $M$ depending only on the modulus of continuity of $u$, i.e. $\lVert u^h-u\rVert_\infty \leq M_u\ (h+1)$. Therefore, if $\mathfrak{F}\subset C(]0,\infty[)$ is an equi-uniformly continuous family, then there exists $M=M_\mathfrak{F}$ s.t. $\lVert u^h-u\rVert_\infty \leq M\ (h+1)$ for all $u\in \mathfrak{F}$ and $h>0$. – Pacciu Dec 14 '11 at 17:03
why you write: "If you choose $\varepsilon =1$ in the definition of uniform continuity, you gain a $\delta \in ]0,1]$ s.t. for all $a,b >0$" i know only that $\delta>0$ not $\delta \in ]0,1]$ ... – FrConnection Dec 15 '11 at 15:59
You can always take $\delta$ less than a positive number $\Delta$ in the definition of uniform continuity. In fact, if you call $\delta_1 >0$ the value you gain from the definition of uniform continuity with $\varepsilon =1$, then also $\delta :=\min \{ \Delta ,\delta_1\}$ makes the definition work because: $$|x-y|\leq \delta\ \Rightarrow \ |x-y|\leq \delta_1\ \Rightarrow\ |f(x)-f(y)|\leq 1\; ;$$ moreover such a $\delta$ does not exceed $\Delta$. In particular, in the previous proof I chose $\Delta =1$. – Pacciu Dec 16 '11 at 0:33

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.