Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

My formula booklet in signals analysis states that a condition for the Fourier series of a periodic function $x(t)$ to exist is that one period of $x(t)$ contains a finite number of maxima and minima.

Is this true, and does it mean that I can't find the Fourier series of a square wave? (Because I just did.)

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

  1. The ("formal") Fourier series $\sum_k\ c_k\ e^{ikt}$ of a given $2\pi$-periodic function $t\mapsto x(t)$ "exists" as soon as $x(\cdot)$ is integrable over an interval of length $2\pi$, so that the coefficients $c_k$ can be computed.

  2. The difficult question is: For which $t$ this series converges to the given function value $x(t)\ $? The series may be useful for the study of $x(\cdot)$ even if for some $t$ it does not converge to the desired value (as, e.g., in the case of a square wave).

  3. A sufficient condition for $\sum_k\ c_k\ e^{ikt}=x(t)$ for all $t$ is the following: The given function should be continuous and of bounded variation on ${\mathbb R}/(2\pi)$. (A square wave is not continuous.) Such a function may very well (but usuallly doesn't) have infinitely many proper local maxima and minima, let alone be constant on subintervals. Consider, e.g., the following function, extended periodically to all of ${\mathbb R}$:

$$x(t)\ :=\ t^2\ \cos{1\over t}\quad\bigl(0<|t|\leq\pi\bigr), \qquad x(0):=0\ .$$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.