Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

$\mathfrak{g}$ is a finite-dimensional semisimple Lie algebra over a field $k$ with $\mathrm{char}k=0$. $J(\mathfrak{g})$ is the augmentation ideal of $\mathfrak{g}$. That is, the kernel of $U(\mathfrak{g})\rightarrow k$. The solution to $H^2(\mathfrak{g},J(\mathfrak{g}))\neq0$ shows that a similar statement of Whitehead's second lemma doesn't hold for infinite dimensional $\mathfrak{g}-$module.(Whitehead's second lemma: With the assumptions above, $H^2(\mathfrak{g},M)=0$ if $M$ is a finite dimensional $\mathfrak{g}-$module).

share|improve this question
    
A dimension shifting argument shows that $\operatorname{Ext}^2_{U(\mathfrak{g})}(J, k) = \operatorname{Ext}^3_{U(\mathfrak{g})}(k,k)$ which is nonzero because of the Killing form. But $H^2(\mathfrak{g}, J)=\operatorname{Ext}^2_{U(\mathfrak{g})}(k,J)$ can't be dealt with this way. –  mt_ Dec 16 '13 at 18:30
    
repost @ MO: mathoverflow.net/q/83169 –  Grigory M Dec 19 '13 at 19:10

1 Answer 1

This is false. I copy here my answer posted at the MO question linked by Grigory above: consider the example of $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C})$, and let $J$ be the augmentation ideal of $U(\mathfrak{g})$. Firstly $H^2(\mathfrak{g}, J) = \operatorname{Ext}^2_{U(\mathfrak{g})}(k,J) \cong \operatorname{Ext}^1_{U(\mathfrak{g})}(J,k)$ by Corollary 7.2 of Auslander-Gorenstein Rings by Ajitabh, Smith and Zhang. Then by dimension shifting $\operatorname{Ext}_{U(\mathfrak{g})}^1(J,k) = \operatorname{Ext}_{U(\mathfrak{g})}^2(k,k)$ which is zero by the Whitehead lemmas.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.