Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Assume that the functions $f,g: \mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ are integrable and equal to zero on $(-\infty,0)$, (i.e $f,g \in L^+$). Then by Titchmarsh's theorem:

$f*g$ is zero almost everywhere iff $f$ or $g$ is zero almost everywhere.

Hence the Banach subalgebra $L^+$ of $L^1(\mathbb{R})$ has no zero divisors.

Is the same true for arbitrary integrable $f$ and $g$ on $\mathbb{R}$ ?

share|cite|improve this question
See also this related MO thread – t.b. Dec 11 '11 at 23:04
up vote 4 down vote accepted

To make Yemon Choi's idea more explicit:

The bump function

$$b(x):=\cases{\exp{-1\over 1-x^2} & \bigl(|x|<1\bigr) \cr 0 & \bigl(|x|\geq 1\bigr)\cr}$$

is $C^\infty$ and has compact support $[-1,1]$; whence it is in the Schwartz space ${\cal S}$ and is the inverse transform of its Fourier transform $\hat b\in {\cal S}$. The same is true for the functions $f_1(x):=b(x-1)$ and $f_2(x):=b(x+1)$ whose product is identically zero. But up to a constant factor this product is equal to $\hat f_1\ *\ \hat f_2$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks a lot for answer. – L.T Dec 13 '11 at 13:22

The MO thread that t.b. links to doesn't seem to quite answer the original question, which if I've understood it correctly is:

do there exist $f,g\in L^1({\mathbb R})$, neither of which is a.e. zero, such that $f*g$ is a.e. zero?

I am pretty sure that the answer is yes, because the answer to the analogous question for $\ell^1({\mathbb Z})$ is yes. To see this, work on the circle and consider the simplest function $h_1$ which is piecewise linear on $[-\pi,\pi]$, is zero on the intervals $[-\pi,-\delta]$ and $[\delta,\pi]$ for some fixed $\delta$, and which is $1$ at $0$. (Triangular spike.) Then viewed as a continuous function on ${\mathbb R}/2\pi{\mathbb Z}={\mathbb T}$, the Fourier series of $h_1$ is absolutely summable. Now let $h_2(x) = h_1(x+\pi)$, clearly $h_1\cdot h_2=0$, which means that (FS of $h_1$) $*$ (FS of $h_2$) $=0$.

Now your question takes place on the line, not the circle, but my feeling is that the same construction should work. That is, let $h_1$ and $h_2$ be the same functions as before, but regard them as functions on ${\mathbb R}$. Then both should be the Fourier transforms of integrable functions $f_1,f_2\in L^1{\mathbb R})$, and once again $f_1*f_2=0$ since $h_1\cdot h_2=0$.

(Actually, thinking about it a bit more, I "know" that the answer to your question must be yes, because it is equivalent to the question "does the Fourier algebra $A({\mathbb R})$ contain non-trivial zero divisors?", and it's known that $A({\mathbb R})$ is a regular Banach algebra of functions, meaning that one can find functions which are zero on any prescribed closed subset $F$ and 1 on any prescribed compact set disjoint from $F$; pointwise product in $A({\mathbb R})$ corresponds to convolution in $L^1({\mathbb R})$.)

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks it is helpful. – L.T Dec 12 '11 at 7:58

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.