Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I need help with this one from Stein & Shakarchi.

Let $$E_{4}(\tau)=\sum_{(n,m)\neq (0,0)}{\frac{1}{(n+m\tau)^{4}}}$$ be the Eisenstein series of order $4$. Show that $$\left|E_{4}(\tau)-\frac{\pi^{4}}{45}\right|\leq c e^{-2\pi t}\ \text{if}\ \tau = x + it\ \text{and}\ t \geq 1.$$ and deduce that $$\left|E_{4}(\tau)-\tau^{-4}\frac{\pi^{4}}{45}\right|\leq c t^{-4} e^{-2\pi/ t}\ \text{if}\ \tau = it\ \text{and}\ 0 < t \leq 1.$$

My idea is to use the estimates from the proof of Theorem 2.5 of pp. 277, but I can't see a finish.

Thanks in advance!

EDIT: On page 277, we have the information that in general $$E_{k}(\tau)=\sum_{(n,m)\neq (0,0)}{\frac{1}{(n+m\tau)^{k}}} = 2 \zeta(k) + \frac{2 (-1)^{k/2} (2 \pi)^{k} }{(k-1)!} \sum_{m >0 } {\sum_{l=1}^{\infty}{l^{k-1}e^{2\pi i \tau m l }}}.$$

share|cite|improve this question
You might better your chances of getting help if you mention what the estimates on pg. 277 are. – Dylan Moreland Dec 11 '11 at 20:11
Edited, thanks. – Anna Dec 11 '11 at 23:47
up vote 3 down vote accepted

This was not so bad as I thought. I actually managed to do it by using the crude estimate $\sigma_{3}(r) \leq r^{4} \leq e ^{2\pi t r}$ for $t \geq 1$ (the first part); as for the second part, it is just a matter of tricking it using the first estimate using the inversion formula for $E_{k}(\tau)$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.