Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $V$ be a $\mathbb K$ vector space, $M_1$ and $M_2$ subsets of $V$. ($[M] =$ linear span of $M$) Show that:

a) $[M_1 \cup M_2] = [[M_1 \cup M_2]]$ and specially $[[M]] = [M]$.

What I've tried: I guess once I've proven that $[[M]] = [M]$, it follows that $[M_1 \cup M_2] = [[M_1 \cup M_2]]$, as $[M_1 \cup M_2]$ is nothing more than a normal subset. Can I just say that by definition the linear span is already all linear combinations of vectors from $M$? Then getting again all linear combinations from all linear combinations isn't getting me anything new. Or is there a math way to write this?

b) $[M_1 \cap M_2] \subset [M_1] \cap [M_2]$

What I've tried: Playing with properties like the following:

$M \subset [M]$

$M_1 \subset M_2 \Rightarrow [M_1] \subset [M_2]$

But to no avail. So I have $M_1 \cap M_2 \subset [M_1 \cap M_2]$, $M_1 \subset [M_1]$ and $M_2 \subset [M_2]$, but couldn't prove anything with this.

c) no equality is valid in b).

What I've tried: I suppose they want me to show that $[M_1 \cap M_2] =[M_1] \cap [M_2]$ is false? I fail to understand how this is not true.

Many many thanks in advance!

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Some hints:

For c) (I assume you mean no equality in b)), try to come up with two sets that both span $V$ (or more simply, span the same set), but have no elements in common.

In part a), for $[[M]]=[M]$:

What you said here is essentially correct. But you should write the details out. Show that if $a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_k$ are linear combinations of elements of $M$ (that is, in $[M]$), then a linear combination of these elements is also in $[M]$. This shouldn't be to hard to do (though it might be notationally messy). This gives the inclusion $[[M]]\subset [M]$. The other inclusion is easy...

For b), take a linear combination of elements in $M_1\cap M_2$. It should be clear that this is also in $[M_1]$ and in $[M_2]$ (since elements in $M_1\cap M_2$ are in both of the sets).

Note in all cases, the symbols $M_1$, $M_2$, $M_1\cap M_2$, etc. are just sets; while the symbols $[M_1]$, $[M_2]$ are the linear spans of sets.

For part b):

Suppose ${\bf v}\in [M_1\cap M_2]$. Then $\bf v$ has the form $${\bf v}= c_1 {\bf m_1}+c_2 {\bf m_2}+\cdots +c_k{\bf m_k}$$ for some ${\bf m}_1\in M_1\cap M_2$, ${\bf m}_2\in M_1\cap M_2$,$\ldots $, ${\bf m}_k\in M_1\cap M_2$ and for some scalars $c_1,c_2,\ldots,c_k$ .

Now each ${\bf m}_i\in M_1$, since it is in $M_1\cap M_2$. It follows then that $\bf v$ is a linear combination of vectors from $M_1$. Thus, ${\bf v}\in[M_1]$.

Similarly, ${\bf v}\in [M_2]$; and thus, ${\bf v}\in [M_1]\cap [M_2]$.

This shows $[M_1\cap M_2]\subset[M_1]\cap[M_2]$.

share|improve this answer
sorry, corrected! yes I ment no equality in b) –  Clash Dec 11 '11 at 16:30
hey david, could you help me by b)? It's not clear to me that this is also in [M1] and in [M2]. thanks! –  Clash Dec 11 '11 at 17:23
@clash It's added. –  David Mitra Dec 11 '11 at 17:33
thanks a lot david! –  Clash Dec 11 '11 at 17:44

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.