Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ and $Y_1, \ldots, Y_n$ as as random samples from two normal distributions with means $0$ and variances $\theta_1$ and $\theta_2$ respectively.The null hypothesis is $\theta_1 = \theta_2$ and the alternative is $\theta_1$ not equal to $\theta_2$ I calculated the likelihood ratio (which is shown below) and now I am trying to figure out what this likelihood ratio is a function of. I believe it is a function of $F$ but I am unsure how to show that it is $F$-distributed with $v_1 = n$, and $v_2 = m$. Thanks for the help. $$ \lambda={ { \left\{ {\textstyle 1\over\textstyle 2\pi\bigl[\,(\,\sum x_i^2+\sum y_i^2\,)/(n+m)\, \bigr]} \right\}^{n+m\over2} } \over \biggl[{ {\textstyle1\over\textstyle 2\pi(\sum x_i^2 /n)} }\biggl]^{n/2} \biggl[{ {\textstyle1\over\textstyle 2\pi(\sum y_i^2 /m)} }\biggl]^{m/2} } $$

share|cite|improve this question
I believe it is a function of $F$... What is $F$? – Did Dec 11 '11 at 13:19
I think you should get a monotone function of a statistic with an F-distribution. But you have both $n$ and $m$ in your definition of $\lambda$, whereas no $m$ appears in your statement of the problem. Could it be that you meant $Y_m$ rather than $Y_n$? – Michael Hardy Dec 11 '11 at 17:31
@DidierPiau : Given that the means are known to be $0$ (which might make this essentially a toy problem), I would think "${}\;F\;{}$" would be $((X_1^2+\cdots+X_n^2)/n)/((Y_1^2+\cdots+Y_m^2)/m)$. That's what I would expect to get as a likelihood-ratio test statistic with an F-distribution in this scenario. – Michael Hardy Dec 11 '11 at 17:35
Here's an oddity: Wikipedia's article titled F-test of equality of variances doesn't mention that it's a likelihood-ratio test. – Michael Hardy Dec 11 '11 at 17:42
In this test you would have $m$ and $n$ degrees of freedom. In the more usual F-test, where you have to estimate the population means, you'd have $m-1$ and $n-1$. – Michael Hardy Dec 11 '11 at 17:51
up vote 2 down vote accepted

It is just algebra.

Ok, you have

$$\lambda = \frac{\left[\frac{\sum x_i^2}{n}\right]^{n/2} \left[\frac{\sum y_i^2}{m}\right]^{m/2}} {\left[\frac{\sum x_i^2 + \sum y_i^2}{m+n}\right]^{\frac{m+n}{2}}}$$

We can easily factor this

$$\lambda = \left[\frac{\frac{\sum x_i^2}{n}} {\frac{\sum x_i^2 + \sum y_i^2}{m+n}}\right]^{n/2} \left[\frac{\frac{\sum y_i^2}{m}} {\frac{\sum x_i^2 + \sum y_i^2}{m+n}}\right]^{m/2}$$

Now multiply by the appropriate power of $\frac{\sum y_i^2}{\sum y_i^2}$ to get

$$\lambda = \left[\frac{(m+n)\frac{\sum x_i^2}{\sum y_i^2}}{n\left(1+\frac{\sum x_i^2}{\sum y_i^2}\right)}\right]^{n/2} \left[\frac{(m+n)}{m\left(1+\frac{\sum x_i^2}{\sum y_i^2}\right)}\right]^{m/2}$$

Now we know that $\frac{m}{n}\frac{\sum x_i^2}{\sum y_i^2}$ has a $F_{n,m}$ distribution (it is a ratio of two independent random variables having $\chi^2$ distributions) so we can write $\lambda$ as $$\lambda = \left[\frac{\frac{(n+m)n}{m}F_{n,m}}{ \frac{n^2}{m}\left(F_{n,m}+\frac{m}{n}\right) }\right]^{n/2}\left[\frac{m+n}{n\left(F_{n,m}+\frac{m}{n}\right)}\right]^{m/2}$$

Now this has $\lambda$ as a function of $F$. Check my algebra.

To be useful it should be a monotone function of $F$. That it is is not immediately clear to me.

share|cite|improve this answer
+1. But just to pick a couple of nits: "Now we know that ...... has a Fn,m distribution (it is a ratio of χ2 distributions)"... A couple of points: It should be a ratio of random variables with chi-square distributions, not a "ratio of chi-square distributions. Also, they should be independent. (In this case they are, but merely saying it's a ratio of r.v.s with chi-square distributions is not enough to justify the conclusion. – Michael Hardy Dec 12 '11 at 3:54
@MichaelHardy Thanks. You are of course correct. – deinst Dec 12 '11 at 4:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.