# Is there a name for this problem I can search for approaches on

I have a collection of a collection of numbers that I need to find the smallest number of groups to put them into whereas the distinct set of numbers in each set does not exceed a threshold. For example:

Collection A: 1,2,3
Collection B: 1,2,4,5
Collection C: 1,3,5,7,9
Collection D: 6,7,8,9,10,11
Threshold: 6


A valid solution would be:

Grouping 1: A,B {1,2,3,4,5}
Grouping 2: C   {1,3,5,7,9}
Grouping 3: D   {6,7,8,9,10,11}


Or

Grouping 1: B   {1,2,4,5}
Grouping 2: A,C {1,2,3,5,7,9}
Grouping 3: D   {6,7,8,9,10,11}


In my real problem the number of collections is 1000+ each with 50-300 numbers and my Threshold is 600. I am looking for the following.

1. Is there a common mathematical name for this type of problem I can research.
2. Is there a good approach to solving such a problem which results in the smallest number of Groupings.

Determining the affinity of 2 Collections is trivial (Union and compare vs each individual collection), but when I start to think about an arbitrary number of collections being grouped I can't seem to think of any non-brute force way to attacking the problem which would take a tremendous amount of time for a computer to solve after even 100 collections.

-
Why would I merge A and B, or A and C here? What's your real problem? – J. M. Dec 10 '11 at 1:42
My real problem is determining optimal project mixes for a manufacturing line where I have a limited number of machine slots for parts and want to minimize feeder setup/machine programming per product. I want to throw a big pile of products into 1 end of my black box and out the other side comes the optimal product mix for which Part numbers to group together. There are other factors here but the crux of my problem is how to boil down my huge grouping permutations into a small list of promising options to run additional analysis against, like Qty of each type of part, part physical size, etc. – deepee1 Dec 13 '11 at 16:27
This problem (the optimization problem) is NP-Hard. So the best algorithms you will get that run in polynomial time are approximations. Dynamic programming is usually a good place to start for problems like this. – ml0105 Apr 9 '14 at 13:37