Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Prove that $f : A\subset \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ is uniformly continuous in $A$ $ \iff$ for all

the sequences $(x_n), (y_n)\in A$ such that $$\lim_{n\to +\infty} ( x_n - y_n )= 0$$


$$\lim_{n\to +\infty} ( f(x_n) - f(y_n)) = 0.$$


Let's start with the first to demonstrate the implication:


in this case the hp are:

$ f $ uniformly continuous and $ (x_n), (y_n) $ sequences of numbers from the set $ A $ such that: $$\lim_{n\to+\infty}(x_n - y_n) = 0.$$

and we must show that: $$ \lim_{n\to +\infty} ( f(x_n) - f(y_n)) = 0.$$ Well, for the uniform continuity we have $$\forall\varepsilon> 0, \exists\delta> 0 \, \: \, \ \forall x, y \in A \ | x-y | <\delta \Rightarrow | f (x)-f (y) | <\varepsilon,$$

and by definition of limit: $$ \forall \varepsilon> 0, \exists \nu> 0 \, \, \, \: \, \, \, \ | (x_n-y_n) - 0 | = | x_n-y_n | <\varepsilon, \quad n> \nu $$

but then the fact that, thanks to the uniform continuity we have, $$ | x-y | <\delta \Rightarrow | f (x)-f (y) | <\varepsilon, $$

we have that $$ | f (x_n) - f (y_n) | <\varepsilon, \forall n> \nu $$

which is equivalent to saying

$$ \lim_ {n \to + \infty} (f (x_n) - f (y_n)) = 0. $$ $ "{\Leftarrow}" $

in this case hp are: $$ (1) \lim_{n\to +\infty} ( f(x_n) - f(y_n)) = 0 $$ $$ (2) \lim_{n\to+\infty}(x_n - y_n) = 0.$$ and we must show that $f$ is uniformly continuous: but if (1) and (2) are verified, $f$ is necessarily uniformly continuous . QED

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 0 down vote accepted

Your forward implication is a bit off. In particular, you want $\delta$, not $\epsilon$, in the fourth displayed equation of your proof.

You also need to explicitly show that for any $\epsilon>0$, there is a $N$ (your $\nu$) that "works". You also need to explicitly fix your $\delta$.

You fix a value of $\epsilon$ first, and then state (and prove) that the appropriate $\delta$ and $N$ exist. Then you verify that the choices "work".

So, you could argue as follows:

Let $\epsilon>0$. Then, since $f$ is uniformly continuous on $A$, there is a $\delta>0$ (which we are now specifying) such that $$\tag{1}|x-y|<\delta \Rightarrow |f(x)-f(y)|<\epsilon \quad\text{ for all }x,y \text{ in } A .$$

Now, choose $N$ (as we may) so that $$\tag{2}|x_n-y_n|<\delta\quad\text{ for all }n>N.$$

We have found our $N$. Now we need to show that it actually works:

Then, if $n>N$, we have, by (2), that $|x_n-y_n|<\delta$. Then, from (1), we have $|f(x_n)-f(y_n)|<\epsilon$.

So we have shown that for any $\epsilon>0$, there is an $N$ so that $n>N$ implies $|f(x_n)-f(y_n)|<\epsilon$. Thus $(f(x_n)-f(y_n))\rightarrow 0$, as desired.

For the reverse implication, it seems that you are assuming your result...

Some hints:

Prove the contrapositive statement instead.

To do this, you could do the following:

Suppose that $f$ is not uniformly continuous on $A$. Then there would be an $\epsilon>0$ such that for any positive integer $N$, you can find points $x_n$ and $y_n$ with $|x_n-y_n|<{1\over N}$ but $|f(x_n) -f(y_n)|>\epsilon$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.