Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Hello I have a very simple question of a proof in the book of Docarmo Differential Geometry. In some page of the book , they said that using the proposition 1 , we can deduce that the parametrizations are also diffeomorphism. How can I prove that? I only know that $ x^{-1} y $ it´s diffeomorphism for all parametrizations y. Using this how can I prove that the function $ x^{-1} $ it´s also differentiable? Here are the definitions used in Docarmo of parametrization, and the proposition 1.Parametrization Definition used on Docarmo

Proposition 1 and the Remark

share|cite|improve this question

The inverse function theorem in tandem with the regularity condition tells you that your paramaterization is a local diffeomorphism, and every bijective local diffeomorphism is a diffeomorphism. This is because being a diffeomorphism is a purely local property, and so locally diffeomorphisms and diffeomorphisms are the same thing (obviously), the only difference is the global property of bijectivity.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.