Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have been told that the $\mathbb{Z}$ module $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}=\{0,1\}$ isn't free.

For a module to be free, there must exist a subset such that every element is expressible as a finite linear combination of elements from that subset, and that subset must be linearly independent. So for the case of $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$, why isn't the set $\{1\}$ a basis, since $0=0\cdot1$ and $1=1\cdot1$?

Thanks for any replies

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

The set $\{1\}$ isn't independent, because $2(1)=1+1=0$. (The $2$ here lives in $\Bbb{Z}$, so the "multiplication" is the module action; all $1$s and $0$s live in $\Bbb{Z}/2\Bbb{Z}$.)

share|cite|improve this answer
1  
Ah ok I see, thanks! – Lammey Aug 11 '14 at 6:31

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.