Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.


If we have a polynomial $f$ with a derivative $f\,'$ and quotient $q$ function defined as:


and the roots of $f$ are $x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_k$, how to prove



If $f(x)=x^2-5x+6$, $f\,'(x)=2x+5$,

$q(x)=2 x^{-1}+5 x^{-2}+13 x^{-3}+35 x^{-4}+97 x^{-5}+\ldots$

share|improve this question
Use the fact that $\frac{f'}{f} = (\log f)'$. –  Qiaochu Yuan Dec 7 '11 at 21:20
Do you really want $x^{-i}$ rather than $x^i$? –  Thomas Andrews Dec 7 '11 at 21:21
@ThomasAndrews, yes because the degree of $f'$ is less then $f$. But if you use $1/x$ we can use $x^i$ instead. –  GarouDan Dec 7 '11 at 21:24
I would have said that (assuming $f(x)$ to be monic) using the product rule for differentiating $\prod_k (x-x_k)$ shows that $$\frac{f^\prime}{f} = \sum_k \frac{1}{x-x_k}$$ in which each term can be expanded via the binomial theorem into a power series in $x$, etc. –  Dilip Sarwate Dec 7 '11 at 21:32
@Dilip should post his comment as an answer, I think. Garou: you might be interested in the Newton-Girard identities. –  J. M. Dec 7 '11 at 22:37

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Assume without loss of generality that $f(x)$ is a monic polynomial with $n$ roots $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n$ so that we can write $$f(x) = \prod_{k=1}^n(x-x_k)$$

The product rule for derivatives then gives us $$f^{\prime}=\frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dx}f(x)=\frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dx}\prod_{k=1}^n(x-x_k)= \sum_{k=1}^n\ \,\prod_{i=1,i\neq k}^n(x-x_i)$$ where the $k$-th term of the sum on the right is the product of all the $(x-x_i)$ except $(x-x_k)$. Therefore, $$\frac{f^{\prime}}{f} = \frac{\sum_{k=1}^n\prod_{i=1,i\neq k}^n(x-x_i)}{\prod_{k=1}^n(x-x_k)} = \sum_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{x-x_k}.$$ Now, basic "long division" of $1$ by $x-x_k$ produces a "quotient" $$x^{-1} + x_k\cdot x^{-2} + x_k^2\cdot x^{-3} + \cdots $$ so that $$\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{x-x_k} = \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\left(\sum_{k=1}^n x_k^{i-1}\right)\cdot x^{-i}$$ which is essentially the answer wanted by Dan Garou except that, as noted by Thomas Andrews, it is "off-by-one." The "long division" can be formalized by expanding $(1-x_k\cdot x^{-1})^{-1}$ in a Taylor series in $x^{-1}$or the binomial theorem etc. but I will leave the details to Dan Garou to fill in.

Note: If anyone feels strongly enough about the cavalier treatment of power series in this last part to want to fill in the details, please feel free to edit this answer.

share|improve this answer
If we think of them as formal power series, it doesn't seem so cavalier. +1, of course. –  J. M. Dec 7 '11 at 23:35
Really thx. Very nice proof. –  GarouDan Dec 8 '11 at 0:30

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.