Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Fix an integer $m\geq 1$. Let $f:(0,1)\to \mathbf{R}$ be defined by $$f(x) = 16x^{1-m}\exp \left( \frac{8x}{1-x} \right) .$$ Can we determine a lower bound for $f$ in terms of $m$?

share|cite|improve this question
The title and the body pose two different questions. Which of them is your question? – joriki Dec 6 '11 at 12:28
You're right. I edited it. It's clear that the function has a minimum on a compact subset of $(0,1)$. The function explodes at the end points. I just need a good choice of $x$ to get a value as small as possible. For $m=1$, you can show that $f(x) \to 16$ as $x\to 0$. – Ralph Tomi Dec 6 '11 at 12:43
Take the logarithm $g(x)=\ln f(x)$, and write the equation for its minimum, $g'(x)=0$. This yields a quadratic equation in $x$ (after multiplying through by $x(1-x)^2$). You can solve it explicitly and plug the solution back into your original equation to find the exact minimum. – mjqxxxx Dec 6 '11 at 13:04
up vote 0 down vote accepted

Differentiating with respect to $x$ yields


This is zero if the expression in parentheses is zero, that is, for


You can solve this quadratic equation for $x$ to find the extrema. Since the function goes to infinity for $x\to0^+$ and $x\to1^-$, exactly one of the two extrema lies in $(0,1)$. I don't think you'll get a particularly nice form for the function value at the minimum, though you can simplify it somewhat by using


share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.