Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I would like to verify the validity of the following line of thought:

Let $K \subset E$ be a field extension. Let $K[x]$ be the polynomial ring over $x$ and denote $K(x)$ its field of quotients (the rational functions over $K$).

Now assume $f(x)=g(x)h(x)$ with $f(x),g(x) \in K[x]$ and $h(x) \in E[x]$ and all $f$, $g$, $h$ are different than zero. Then $\frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = h(x)$ in $E(x)$. So $h(x) \in K(x)$. But $h(x)$ is a polynomial, so $h(x) \in K[x]$.

Is there any other simpler argument than that?


Let me be more specific. Let $x^p - a \in K[x]$, with $p$ being prime and $char(K)=p$. Let $b$ be the unique root of $x^p - a$ in its splitting field $K(b)$. Then $x^p - a=(x-b)^p \in K(b)[x].$ Let $m_b(x) \in K[x]$ be the minimal polynomial of $b$ over $K$. Then $m_b(x)$ divides $(x-b)^p$ and so $m_b(x)=(x-b)^l$ and $l$ is the smallest positive integer for which $(x-b)^l \in K[x]$. Let $p = lq+r$ where $0 \ge <l$. Then $x^p-a=(m_b(x))^q (x-b)^r$. Can i conclude that $(x-b)^r \in K[x]$ and so $r=0$ by the minimality of $l$?


share|cite|improve this question
If you have shown elsewhere that $K(x)\cap E[x]=K[x]$ (you can form the intersection inside $E(x)$), then this is ok. – Jyrki Lahtonen Dec 5 '11 at 21:45
i see, that's a subtle point – Manos Dec 5 '11 at 21:50
@Jyrki: i added a specific instance of my question. What do you think in that case? – Manos Dec 6 '11 at 0:40
up vote 4 down vote accepted

HINT $\ $ It follows from the uniqueness of the quotient (and remainder) in the division algorithm (which is the same in $\rm\:K[x]\:$ and $\rm\:E[x]\:,\:$ using the polynomial degree as the Euclidean valuation). Thus since dividing $\rm\:f\:$ by $\rm\:g\:$ in $\rm\:E[x]\:$ leaves remainder $0$, by uniqueness, the remainder must also be $0$ in $\rm\:K[x]\:,\:$ i.e. $\rm\:g\ |\ f\ $ in $\rm\:E[x]\:$ $\:\Rightarrow\:$ $\rm\:g\ |\ f\ $ in $\rm\:K[x]\:.\:$

This is but one of many examples of the power of uniqueness theorems for proving equalities.

share|cite|improve this answer
This is very good. Thanks a lot. – Manos Dec 6 '11 at 2:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.