Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

$$A-4I= \left(\begin{array}{rrr} -3&2&0 \\ 2&-2&\sqrt2 \\ 0&\sqrt2&-3 \end{array}\right) $$

From my calculations it seems that $x_1,x_2 \text{ and }x_3$ are all leading variables. However, my teacher expressed the basis in terms of $x_3$. What I know is that we can't express a basis in terms of leading variables, we can only in terms of free variables. Any help please?

The reduced form is: $\left(\begin{array}{rrr} 1&0&0 \\ 0&1&0 \\ 0&0&1 \end{array}\right) $

So all three are linearly independent, right?

How am I supposed to construct the eigenspace of this?

share|cite|improve this question
I'm not sure what you want to happen here. In your first equation, there is a $\lambda$ on the left, but not on the right... – J. M. Dec 5 '11 at 16:53's not on the right, because $\lambda$ was 4 and I already subtracted it. – Andrew Dec 5 '11 at 16:55
Um, you can't. You must have made an arithmetic error somewhere. (And, on the left, do you want $A-4I$?) – David Mitra Dec 5 '11 at 16:55
@DavidMitra Yes, it's -4I. I corrected it. I'm trying to re-reduce it – Andrew Dec 5 '11 at 16:57
@andrew Because, if there weren't, then you wouldn't have obtained $I$ as the echelon form. – David Mitra Dec 5 '11 at 17:01
up vote 1 down vote accepted

If you know that $\lambda=4$ is, indeed, an eigenvalue, then you would know the null space of the matrix $A-4I$ is non-trivial. There is a non-zero vector $\bf x$ with $(A-4I){\bf x}=\bf 0$.

Now the claimed reduced form of $A-4I$ clearly has a trivial null space. What a quandry...

We can say:

Either $\lambda=4$ is not an eigenvalue

or you made an arithmetic mistake in deriving the reduced form.

You need to check what's wrong. Is $4$ really an eigenvalue? If so, then you need to redo your reduction.

(I did it and obtained $\left[\matrix{-3&2&0\cr 0&-2&3\sqrt2\cr 0&0&0} \right]$, which has non-trivial solutions.)

share|cite|improve this answer
$\left(\begin{array}{rrr} -3&2&0 \\ 2&-2&\sqrt2 \\ 0&\sqrt2&-3 \end{array}\right) $ $\frac{2}{3}R_1+R_2$->$R_2$ $\left(\begin{array}{rrr} -3&2&0 \\ 0&-4&\sqrt2 \\ 0&\sqrt2&-3 \end{array}\right) $ $\frac{\sqrt2}{4}R_2+R_3$->$R_3$ $\left(\begin{array}{rrr} -3&2&0 \\ 0&-4&\sqrt2 \\ 0&0&\frac{-5}{2} \end{array}\right)$ This is what I get, I can't find the error – Andrew Dec 5 '11 at 17:18
${2\over 3}R_1=[ -2\ \ {4\over 3}\ \ 0] $; ${2\over3}R_1+R_2 =[ 0\ \ -{2\over3}\ \ \sqrt2]$. – David Mitra Dec 5 '11 at 17:22

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.