Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am following the J.Lee's book "Introduction to Smooth Manifolds", 2nd ed., page 480-486 to learn the de Rham theorem. It is proven on manifolds without boundary, which makes me curious about whether it holds for manifolds with boundary. At least in the part proving de Rham cohomology is isomorphic to the $C^\infty$ singular cohomology, I did not see a step at first glance where the manifold in question must have no boundary. ("At first glance" means I have checked it did not cite theorems like Whitney approximation theorem that specifically requires the target to be without boundary, but I did not check if all the computation/formula really works for manifolds with boundary.) I also try to search for more sources, and what I have found only talk about the de Rham theorem in no-boundary case.

Thus I wonder if de Rham theorem holds for manifolds with boundary. If it fails, is it still true that de Rham cohomology is isomorphic to the $C^\infty$ singular cohomology?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 14 down vote accepted

Yes, it holds for manifolds with boundary. One way to see this is to note that if $M$ is a smooth manifold with boundary, then the inclusion map $\iota\colon \text{Int}\ M\hookrightarrow M$ is a smooth homotopy equivalence (Thm. 9.26 in ISM), which therefore induces isomorphisms on de Rham cohomology (Thm. 17.11). Since $\iota$ also induces isomorphisms on singular cohomology, and the de Rham homomorphism (integration over chains) commutes with inclusion, the result follows.

(It would have been a good idea to include this in the book, either as a corollary or as a problem. I don't know why I didn't.)

share|cite|improve this answer
This is a nice way to generalize without worrying about regularity and boundary. But just to understand more, does all the steps in the proof of de Rham's theorem work as well on manifolds with boundary? – Y.H. Jul 27 '14 at 19:49
I'm not sure. One problem is that my proof of the isomorphism between smooth singular & singular cohomology uses the Whitney approx theorem for a map that's already smooth on a closed subset, and this doesn't generally work when the target has nonempty boundary. But this might be fixable. – Jack Lee Jul 27 '14 at 21:16

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.