Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Here $\Gamma_{jk}^{t}$ is the Christoffel symbol of the second kind, and $g$ is the Riemann metric on a Riemann manifold.When learning Riemann Geometry, we are usually introduced to the following equation:


Then to get an expression of $\Gamma$ in terms of $g_{ij}$, we will replace $(ijk)$ with $(jki),(kij)$, and so on...

But what about the following way:

Suppose $(A^{i})$ is any tensor, behaving like $(dx^i)$.By contraction, we will get


$A^{i}A^{j}g_{ij,k}=A^{i}A^{j}g_{lj}\Gamma_{ik}^{l}+A^{i}A^{j}g_{il}\Gamma_{jk}^{l}= A^{j}A^{i}g_{li}\Gamma_{jk}^{l}+A^{i}A^{j}g_{il}\Gamma_{jk}^{l}=2A^{i}A^{j}g_{li}\Gamma_{jk}^{l}$.

Since $(A^{i})$ is arbitary , we then get that


It is a bit weird, isn't it?Is the above calculation right?

Will someone be kind enough to point out the flaws in the above reasoning or give me some hints on this problem?Thank you very much!

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The problem is that there is a symmetry in $A^i A^j$, i.e., $A^i A^j = A^j A^i$. So, you can not get $g_{ij,k}=2g_{li} \Gamma^{l}_{jk}$ from the above equation. You can just get $\Sigma_{i>j} A^i A^j (g_{ij,k}-2g_{li}\Gamma^l_{jk}+g_{ji,k}-2g_{lj}\Gamma^l{ik})=0$ and $g_{ij,k}-2g_{li}\Gamma^l_{jk}+g_{ji,k}-2g_{lj}\Gamma^l{ik}=0$, which is just the equation showed in the first paragraph.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you very much for your concise answer! – user14242 Dec 2 '11 at 6:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.