Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

How can I determine the type of a singularity of a function $$f(z)={e^{1/z} \over z-1}+{\pi z \over 2\sin(\pi z)}$$

at $z_0=0$?

I don't see an easy way to represent it using Laurent series, neither I don't see how I can find the limit of the function with $z\to 0$.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Look at $e^{1/z}$ around $z = 0$. This function approaches every point in the complex plane (take the limit along the real axis, positive or negative or along the imaginary axis). Dividing by and adding a meromorphic function does not change this, so there is no singularity that can be characterized in the normal way with Laurent series, residues, etc. This is called an essential singularity.

share|cite|improve this answer
That's clear, I have the same result, that made me more confident I was thinking in a correct way. But that means that I can't get use of the Residue theory for integration to find a path integral where the path is a circle with a middle point $z_0=0$? – Dmitry Kazakov Jul 19 '14 at 11:38
Yes, that is correct. The theory of residues is only defined for meromorphic functions - that is, functions on the complex plane that have poles rather than essential singularities. – Dorebell Jul 19 '14 at 11:40
So but it's still possible to do using Cauchy's integral formulae, isn't it? – Dmitry Kazakov Jul 19 '14 at 11:41
No, Cauchy's integral formula is also for meromorphic functions. Basically, any normal complex analysis is completely useless for these sorts of functions near essential singularities. Now, if you work in a part of the complex plane that avoids the origin entirely, you can use all of these things. – Dorebell Jul 19 '14 at 11:42
@DmitryKazakov This is becoming another question on itself. Please ask it separately. – Git Gud Jul 19 '14 at 11:46

It is essentially because the part $e^{\frac{1}{z}}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\frac{1}{z^n}}{n!}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{z^n\cdot n!}$ attains infinity times often addends in the form $\frac{a_k}{z^k}$ (an the other parts are holomorphic or liftable in $0$, in a neighborhood of $0$) so the principal part has infinity many addeds. Thus $z_0=0$ as an essentially singularity.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.