Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Does this argument make sense?

So I have a bilinear form $B:V\times V\to F$. (BTW, is bilinear form equivalent to a bilinear map?) where $V$ is a finite-dimensional vector space.

I have a subspace $X\leq V$ which happens to be the annihilator of a subspace $Y\leq V$ wrt $B$.

Now, $B|_X$ is nonsingular and I claim that that implies that $B$ itself is nonsingular. (Is nonsingular the same as non-degenerate?)

So here is my argument:

$(x_1\,\,...\,\, x_k)^T[B](x_1 ...x_k)=M$ where $M$ is non-singular and $\{x_i\}$ is a basis for $X$ $\implies [B]\(x_1 ...x_k)=[(x_1\,\,...\,\, x_k)^T]^{-1}M$, which is non-singular.

Now $(y_1\,\,...\,\, y_m)^T[B](x_1 ...x_k)=0$ where $\{y_i\}$ is a basis for $Y$ $\implies (y_1... y_m)^T [(x_1\,\,...\,\, x_k)^T]^{-1}M=0$ $\implies Y=\{0\}$ 

$\implies \forall Y\leq V$ s.t. $X$ is its annihilator wrt $B$, $Y=\{0\}$

$\implies B$ is non-singular.


Alternative more elegant proofs are welcomed!

share|cite|improve this question
A bilinear form is a bilinear map whose codomain is the scalar field. – Henning Makholm Nov 30 '11 at 21:26
@HenningMakholm: Thanks. – Zachmann Dec 1 '11 at 0:10

Reading the proof given in question, I get lost at $[(x_1\dots x_k)^T]^{−1}$. Presumably, $x_1,\dots,x_k$ are column vectors of size $\dim V$, but then $(x_1\dots x_k)^T$ need not be a square matrix. Anyway, turning everything into a mess of matrices and bases isn't the way to go.

Although this is not stated in the question, I will assume $B$ is symmetric, because otherwise "the annihilator of a subspace" does not make sense: one has left and right annihilators instead.

Proof. Suppose $B$ is degenerate, i.e., there is a nonzero vector $v$ such that $\{v\}^\perp = V$. Since $Y^\perp= X$, it follows that $v\in X$. But then $B_{|X}$ is also degenerate. $\Box$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.