Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have trouble proving the following theorem:

If $E$ is a locally convex, Hausdorff topological vector space, then $E^*$ is metrizable if and only if $E$ has an (at most) countable basis.

I've proved the 'if'-part, but I'm stuck with the 'only if' part. I've tried doing it the following way: suppose $E$ doesn't have a countable basis, so $E = \oplus_{i \in I} \mathbb{R}e_i$ with $|I| > \aleph_0$. The topology on $E^*$ is determined by the seminorms $p_x:E^* \rightarrow \mathbb{R},f \mapsto |f(x)|, x \in E$, but since $x$ is in $E$, this is the same as taking $p_i:E^* \rightarrow \mathbb{R},f \mapsto |f(e_i)|$ for each $i \in I$. Now, if $E^*$ would be metrizable, it would be $A_1$, so there would be a countable basis $V_n, n \in \mathbb{N}$ so that $$ \forall K \subset I \text{ finite }, \forall k \in K, \forall \epsilon_k > 0 \exists n: V_n \subset \bigcap_{k \in K} \{p_k < \epsilon_k\}. $$ I'm trying to get a contradiction, but I don't know how to do it. Any help would be appreciated.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

If I’m not mistaken, you’ve essentially identified $E^*$ with $^I\mathbb{R}$, the family of all real-valued functions on the index set $I$, equipped with the seminorms $p_i(f)=|f(i)|$ for $i\in I$. For each finite $F\subseteq I$, $\epsilon>0$, and $f\in ^I\mathbb{R}$ let $$\begin{align*}B_{F,\epsilon}(f)&=\{g\in^I\mathbb{R}:\forall i\in F[p_i(g-f)<\epsilon]\}\\ &=\{g\in^I\mathbb{R}:\forall i\in F[|g(i)-f(i)|<\epsilon]\}; \end{align*}$$ the family of all such $B_{F,\epsilon}(f)$ is a local base at $f$.

Recall that every metric space is first countable, meaning that each point has a countable local base. Suppose that $\{V_k:k\in\omega\}$ is a local base at $f\in^I\mathbb{R}$. Then for each $k\in\omega$ there must be a finite $F_k\subseteq I$ and an $n_k\in\omega$ such that $B_{F_k,2^{-n_k}}(f)\subseteq V_k$. It follows that $$\{f\}\subseteq\bigcap_{k\in\omega}B_{F_k,2^{-n_k}}(f)\subseteq\bigcap_{k\in\omega}V_k=\{f\}$$ and hence that $$\bigcap_{k\in\omega}B_{F_k,2^{-n_k}}(f)=\{f\}\;.$$

Let $C=\bigcup\limits_{k\in\omega}F_k$; clearly $C$ is countable, so we can choose $i_0\in I\setminus C$. Now define $g\in^I\mathbb{R}$ by $$g(i)=\begin{cases} f(i),&i\ne i_0\\ f(i_0)+1,&i=i_0\;; \end{cases}$$ clearly $g\ne f$, and it’s not hard to see that $$g\in\bigcap_{k\in\omega}B_{F_k,2^{-n_k}}(f)\;.$$

This is the desired contradiction. By the way, $^I\mathbb{R}$ with this topology is easily seen to be homeomorphic to the product topology on $\mathbb{R}^{|I|}$, so the problem really boils down to showing that $\mathbb{R}^\kappa$ is metrizable iff $\kappa\le\omega$.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, I got it now (I used it too to refine my proof of the 'if'-part as well). Thanks for you help. –  KevinDL Dec 2 '11 at 14:40
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.