Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Please someone could explain me why the curves have no intrinsic geometry? With surfaces I can see that there are two kind of geometries, i.e. the euclidean one (related to euclidean isometries) and the intrinsic (related to isometries on surfaces), but I am not able to make a comparison/analogy with curves. Thanks.

share|cite|improve this question
It depends on what you mean by "curve." – Qiaochu Yuan Nov 29 '11 at 23:54
...and by "intrinsic geometry". – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Nov 30 '11 at 0:04
up vote 2 down vote accepted

One possible interpretation for the statement «curves have no intrinsic geometry» in the context of Riemannian geometry is the following:

  • A non-compact $1$-dimensional Riemannian manifold is isometric to an open interval in the line.There is an intrinsic Riemannian invariant of such a manifold: the number $\nu$ of points added by the procedure of completion, which is an element of the set $\{0,1,2\}$. When $\nu=2$, there is moreover a secondary invariant, the length of the curve.

  • On the other hand, there is exactly one intrinsic Riemannian invariant of a compact $1$-dimensional Riemannian manifold, its length, which is a positive real number.

Most of this is proved implicitly when one shows that a curve can always be parametrized by arc-length, after classifying $1$-dimensional differentiable manifolds.

A cuter statement, although partial, is that the complete $1$-dimensional manifolds up to isometry are in bijective correspondence with $(0,\infty]$.

Likewise, the local version of this is: any two $1$-dimensional Riemannan manifolds are locally isometric.

share|cite|improve this answer
As in: "I Like Bananas (Because They Have No Bones)" – Will Jagy Nov 30 '11 at 0:20

Curves have the same intrinsic geometry that a straight line has. If $B$ is between $A$ and $C$ then the distance from $A$ to $B$ (measured along the curve, i.e. the arc length) plus the distance from $B$ to $C$, is the distance from $A$ to $C$. If a string winds around through space and you pick it up and lay it down unrolled so that it's a straight line, you don't change any of the intrinsic distances; the length of the curve from $A$ to $B$ is still the same. Hence the curvature doesn't matter.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.