Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let be $\varphi:\mathbb C^{2\times 2}\to\mathbb C$ with the following properties: $$$$

  1. It is linear on the columns: $$\left\{\begin{align} \varphi\left(\left[\begin{matrix}a_1+a_2&b\\c_1+c_2&d\\\end{matrix}\right]\right) = \varphi\left(\left[\begin{matrix}a_1&b\\c_1&d\\\end{matrix}\right]\right) + \varphi\left(\left[\begin{matrix}a_2&b\\c_2&d\\\end{matrix}\right]\right)\\ \varphi\left(\left[\begin{matrix}a&b_1+b_2\\c&d_1+d_2\\\end{matrix}\right]\right) = \varphi\left(\left[\begin{matrix}a&b_1\\c&d_1\\\end{matrix}\right]\right) + \varphi\left(\left[\begin{matrix}a&b_2\\c&d_2\\\end{matrix}\right]\right)\\ \qquad\varphi\left(\left[\begin{matrix}ka&b\\kc&d\\\end{matrix}\right]\right) = \varphi\left(\left[\begin{matrix}a&kb\\c&kd\\\end{matrix}\right]\right) = k\varphi\left(\left[\begin{matrix}a&b\\c&d\\\end{matrix}\right]\right)\\ \end{align}\right.\qquad.$$

  2. It is anti-symmetric on the columns: $$\varphi\left(\left[\begin{matrix}b&a\\d&c\\\end{matrix}\right]\right) = -\,\varphi\left(\left[\begin{matrix}a&b\\c&d\\\end{matrix}\right]\right)\quad.$$

  3. It maps identity to identity: $$\varphi\left(\left[\begin{matrix}1&0\\0&1\\\end{matrix}\right]\right)=1\quad.$$

$$$$ I was told that, given these properties, $\varphi\small\left(\left[\begin{matrix}a&b\\c&d\\\end{matrix}\right]\right)$ has to be $ad-bc\,$, good old $\det\small\left[\begin{matrix}a&b\\c&d\\\end{matrix}\right]$, and that applies to any $\mathbb C^{n\times n}$. Is this true?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Yes. You can see this by hand in the two-by-two case, though I think you kind of have to know what you're looking for to stumble across an argument.

First of all, convince yourself that $\varphi\left(\pmatrix{ka & la \\ kb & lb}\right) = 0$ for any $k, l, a, b$. That's because you can pull out the $kl$, and then $\varphi\left(\pmatrix{a & a \\ b & b}\right) = 0$ because switching the two columns on one hand negates the value of $\varphi$ and on the other hand leaves the matrix unchanged. This means, in particular, that if $ad - bc = 0$, then $\varphi\left(\pmatrix{a & b \\ c & d}\right) = 0$ as well.

Now, let $X = \varphi\left(\pmatrix{a & b \\ c & d}\right)$. We want use your properties to show that $X = ad - bc$ if $ad - bc \neq 0 $ as well. We have

$\begin{align*} (ad-bc) X &= da X + 0 - (-c)(-b) X + 0 \\ & = \varphi\left(\pmatrix{da & ab \\ dc & ad}\right) + \varphi\left(\pmatrix{ (-c)b & ab \\ (-c)d & ad}\right) \\& \qquad \qquad + \varphi\left(\pmatrix{(-c)b & (-b)a \\ (-c)d & (-b)c}\right) + \varphi\left(\pmatrix{da & (-b)a \\ dc & (-b)c}\right) \\ & = \varphi\left(\pmatrix{ad - bc & ab \\ 0 & ad}\right) + \varphi\left(\pmatrix{ad - bc & -ab \\ 0 & -bc}\right) \\ & = \varphi\left(\pmatrix{ad - bc & 0 \\ 0 & ad - bc}\right) \\ & = (ad - bc)^2. \end{align*}$

So if $ad - bc \neq 0$, then $X = ad - bc$, as desired.

In general you can play the same game. Your first two properties tell you how $\varphi$ changes under column operations -- i.e., under multiplication by another matrix on the right. But multiplying by the adjugate matrix on the right gives you the determinant times the identity, whence you can deduce that $\varphi$ of a matrix is just its determinant.

share|cite|improve this answer

Yes, and if you're only interested in the two-by-two case then you can quite easily see it by expanding your function $\phi$ in terms of these properties. What I mean is, using only the first two properties, you should be able to reduce $\varphi\left(\left[\begin{matrix}a&b\\c&d\\\end{matrix}\right]\right)$ to a multiple of $\varphi\left(\left[\begin{matrix}1&0\\0&1\\\end{matrix}\right]\right)$, and then using property three you get the result.

I hope that was clear enough.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.