Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The question is to compute the following multidimensional integral:

\begin{equation} \omega^{(T)}({\bf c}) := \int\limits_{{\mathbb R}^{2 T}} \delta\left( c_{1,1} - \sum\limits_{j=1}^T x_{1,j}^2 \right) \delta\left( c_{2,2} - \sum\limits_{j=1}^T x_{2,j}^2 \right) \delta\left( c_{1,2} - \sum\limits_{j=1}^T x_{1,j} x_{2,j} \right) \prod\limits_{j=1}^T d x_{1,j} d x_{2,j} \end{equation}

This is the ``density of states'' of the estimator of covariances in a random matrix ensemble. Using the definition of delta function and elementary integration I have checked that :

\begin{eqnarray} \omega^{(1)}({\bf c}) &=& \delta\left(\det(c)\right) \\ \omega^{(2)}({\bf c}) &=& \pi (\det(c))^{-1/2} \\ \omega^{(3)}({\bf c}) &=& \pi^2 1_{\det(c) >0} \\ \omega^{(4)}({\bf c}) &=& \pi^3 \left(\det(c)\right)^{1/2} \end{eqnarray}

where \begin{equation} {\bf c} := \left(\begin{array}{cc} c_{1,1} & c_{1,2} \\ c_{1,2} & c_{2,2} \end{array} \right) \end{equation}

The question is what is the result for generic values of $T$. I suspect that the result depends only on the determinant of the matrix ${\bf c}$.

share|improve this question
Is the fourth case you checked supposed to be for $T=3$ or for $T=4$? –  Semiclassical Aug 15 at 18:39
Sorry, there was a typo. Of course the bottom case is related to T=4. In general the result goes like det(c)^(T/2-3/2). i will try to demonstrate it today. –  Przemo Aug 18 at 9:37

4 Answers 4

up vote 0 down vote accepted

To simplify our task, note that WLOG we can choose the coordinates to set $c_{11},c_{22}$ to unity. (The overall dimensionful factor lost by this redefinition will be dealt with at the end of the calculation.) This renders the first two $\delta$-functions as $$\delta(1-\mathbf{x}_1^2)\delta(1-\mathbf{x}_2^2)=\frac{1}{4}\delta(1-\Vert\mathbf{x}_1\Vert)\delta(1-\Vert\mathbf{x}_2\Vert).$$ We furthermore may take the third constraint to be $\cos\Theta=\mathbf{x}_1\cdot\mathbf{x}_2=\cos\theta_{12}$ where $\theta_{12}$ is the angle between the two vectors in $\mathbb{R}^T$. This conveniently expresses the determinant as $1-\cos^2\Theta = \sin^2\Theta$. Integrating out the first two $\delta$-functions, we may write our integral of interest as

$$\Omega^{(T)}(\Theta):=\frac{\omega^{(T)}(\Theta))}{V(S_{T-1}}= \frac{1}{4V(S_{T-1})}\int\!\!\!\int_{R} \delta\left(\cos\Theta-\cos\theta_{12}\right)\,d\Omega_1 \,d\Omega_2$$ where $R=S_{T-1}\times S_{T-1}$.

The switch to $\Omega$ may seem superfluous. But we may take the coordinates of $\mathbf{x_2}$ to have $\mathbf{x_1}$ as its azimuthal axis so that the constraint is simply $\cos\Theta=\cos\theta_2$. Then the integration over $x_1$ simply gives as an overall factor the volume of $S_{n-1}$ and we may write

$$\Omega^{(T)}(\Theta)=\frac{1}{4}\int_{S_{T-1}} \delta(\cos\Theta-\cos\theta)\,d\Omega$$ where we have dropped the now-superfluous subscript.

To evaluate this integral, we reintroduce the $r$-integration to return to an integral over $\mathbb{R}^n$ i.e.

\begin{align} \frac{1}{4}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}d^n \! x \, \delta(\cos\Theta-\cos\theta)\delta(1-\Vert \mathbb{x}\Vert) &=\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}d^n\!x \, \delta(\cos\Theta-\cos\theta)\delta(1-\Vert \mathbb{x}\Vert^2)\\ &=\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}d^n\!x \, \delta(\cos\Theta-x_n)\delta(1-\Vert \mathbb{x}\Vert^2) \end{align} where we have taken $\cos\theta$ to denote the $n$-th coordinate restricted to the unit $(n-1)$-sphere. Writing $\mathbf{y}=\mathbf{x}-x_n \hat{e}_n$, we can use the first $\delta$-function to express the second as $$\delta(1-\Vert \mathbb{x}\Vert^2)=\delta(1-x_n^2- \Vert \mathbb{y}\Vert^2)=\delta(1-\cos^2\theta-\Vert \mathbb{y}\Vert^2)=\delta(\sin^2\Theta-\Vert \mathbb{y}\Vert^2)$$ We can thus integrate out the $n$-th coordinate entirely to obtain

$$\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n-1}}d^{n-1}\!x \, \delta(\sin^2\Theta-\Vert \mathbb{x}\Vert^2) =\frac{1}{4|\sin\Theta|}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n-1}}d^{n-1}\!x \, \delta(|\sin\Theta|-\Vert \mathbb{x}\Vert)=\frac{1}{4}V(S_{n-2})|\sin\Theta|^{n-2}$$ from which we conclude that $\omega^{(T)}(\Theta)=\frac{1}{4}|\sin\Theta|^{n-2}V(S_{n-1})V(S_{n-2})$. All that remains is to express this in terms of $\det(\mathbf{c})$ and restore the overall constants lost in setting $c_{11}=c_{22}=1$...

share|improve this answer
@Przemo: Can you check your calculation of the $T=2$ case, actually? Doing it directly by hand is giving me the answer I found above. –  Semiclassical Aug 19 at 15:47
I show the calculations for $T=2$ below. I think they are correct. .. –  Przemo Aug 19 at 17:14
There is a typo in the last equation in your answer.The middle integral is a surface of a sphere of radius $|\sin(\Theta)|$ in $n-1$ dimensions. Including the denominator the final result is $\omega^{(T)}(\Theta) = \frac{1}{4} |\sin(\Theta)|^{n-3} V(S_{n-1}) V(S_{n-2})$ at $n=T$. Here by $V(S_{n-1})$ you mean the surface of a unit sphere in $n$ dimensions. Now the normalization factor is just $\left(\sqrt{c_{1,1} c_{2,2}}\right)^{T-3}$. Bringing all this together we get $\omega^{(T)}(\Theta) = 2^{T-2} \pi^{T-1}/(T-2)! \left(\det(c)\right)^{(T-3)/2}$ which is half of my result. –  Przemo Oct 7 at 12:57
It is your result that is correct. Mine was too small by a factor of one half. –  Przemo Oct 7 at 12:58

I will present the answer for $T=5$. I hope that it will be clear how to generalize that answer to an arbitrary value of $T$. Let us go a ``polar coordinates'' in the $2 T$-dimensional space. Therefore we write: \begin{equation} \left(\begin{array}{c} x_{j,1} \\ x_{j,2} \\ x_{j,3} \\ x_{j,4} \\ x_{j,5} \end{array}\right) = \left( \begin{array}{l} r_j \cos(\theta_1^{(j)}) \cos(\theta_2^{(j)}) \cos(\theta_3^{(j)}) \cos(\phi^{(j)}) \\ r_j \cos(\theta_1^{(j)}) \cos(\theta_2^{(j)}) \cos(\theta_3^{(j)}) \sin(\phi^{(j)}) \\ r_j \cos(\theta_1^{(j)}) \cos(\theta_2^{(j)}) \sin(\theta_3^{(j)}) \\ r_j \cos(\theta_1^{(j)}) \sin(\theta_2^{(j)}) \\ r_j \sin(\theta_1^{(j)}) \end{array} \right) \end{equation} Here $\phi^{(j)} \in \left(0,2\pi\right)$ and $\theta_j^{(1)} \in \left(-\pi/2,\pi/2\right)$ and $j=1,2$. The Jacobian of the transformation is equal to $\prod\limits_{j=1}^2 r_j^{T-1} \cos(\theta_1^{(j)})^3 \cos(\theta_2^{(j)})^2 \cos(\theta_3^{(j)})^1$. Now the integrand reads: \begin{eqnarray} &&\left[\prod\limits_{j=1}^2 r_j^{T-1} \delta\left(c_{j,j} - r_j^2\right)\right] \cdot \left[\prod\limits_{l=1}^{T-2} \cos(\theta_l^{(1)})^{T-l-1} \cos(\theta_l^{(2)})^{T-l-1} \right]\\ && \delta\left(c_{1,2} - r_1 r_2\left( \cos(\phi^{(1)}-\phi^{(2)}) \cdot\prod\limits_{l=1}^{T-2} \cos(\theta_l^{(1)}) \cos(\theta_l^{(2)}) +\sum\limits_{p=3}^T \sin(\theta_{T-p+1}^{(1)}) \sin(\theta_{T-p+1}^{(2)}) \cdot \prod\limits_{l=1}^{T-p} \cos(\theta_l^{(1)}) \cos(\theta_l^{(2)})\right) \right) \end{eqnarray} Let us integrate over $(\phi^{(1)},\phi^{(2)}) \in (0,2 \pi)^2$ first. The result reads: \begin{eqnarray} \left(2\pi\right) \frac{\prod\limits_{l=1}^{T-2} \cos(\theta_l^{(1)})^{T-l-1} \cos(\theta_l^{(2)})^{T-l-1}} {\sqrt{\left(r_1 r_2\prod\limits_{l=1}^{T-2} \cos(\theta_l^{(1)}) \cos(\theta_l^{(2)})\right)^2 - \left(c_{1,2} - r_1 r_2\sum\limits_{p=3}^T \sin(\theta_{T-p+1}^{(1)}) \sin(\theta_{T-p+1}^{(2)}) \cdot \prod\limits_{l=1}^{T-p} \cos(\theta_l^{(1)}) \cos(\theta_l^{(2)})\right)^2}} \end{eqnarray} Now we integrate over $\left(\theta_{T-2}^{(1)},\theta_{T-2}^{(2)}\right) \in \left(-\pi/2,\pi/2\right)^2$. This integral is readily done by substituting for sinuses of those angles. We have: \begin{eqnarray} &&\frac{\left(2\pi\right)^2}{r_1 r_2} \cdot \left[\prod\limits_{l=1}^{T-3} \cos(\theta_l^{(1)})^{T-l-2} \cos(\theta_l^{(2)})^{T-l-2}\right] \cdot\\ &&1_{r_1 r_2 \cos(\theta_{T-3}^{(1)} - \theta_{T-3}^{(2)})\prod\limits_{l=1}^{T-4} \cos(\theta_l^{(1)}) \cos(\theta_l^{(2)})> c_{1,2} - r_1 r_2\sum\limits_{p=5}^T \sin(\theta_{T-p+1}^{(1)}) \sin(\theta_{T-p+1}^{(2)}) \cdot \prod\limits_{l=1}^{T-p} \cos(\theta_l^{(1)}) \cos(\theta_l^{(2)}) } \end{eqnarray} Now we integrate over $\left(\theta_{T-3}^{(1)},\theta_{T-3}^{(2)}\right) \in \left(-\pi/2,\pi/2\right)^2$. Again, the integral is readily done by substituting for sinuses of those angles.We have: \begin{eqnarray} \frac{(2 \pi)^2}{(r_1 r_2)^2} \pi \cdot \prod\limits_{l=1}^{T-4} \cos(\theta_l^{(1)})^{T-l-3} \cos(\theta_l^{(2)})^{T-l-3} \cdot \sqrt{ \left(r_1 r_2\prod\limits_{l=1}^{T-4} \cos(\theta_l^{(1)}) \cos(\theta_l^{(2)})\right)^2 - \left(c_{1,2} - r_1 r_2\sum\limits_{p=5}^T \sin(\theta_{T-p+1}^{(1)}) \sin(\theta_{T-p+1}^{(2)}) \cdot \prod\limits_{l=1}^{T-p} \cos(\theta_l^{(1)}) \cos(\theta_l^{(2)})\right)^2 } \end{eqnarray} now, we finally integrate over $\left(\theta_{T-4}^{(1)},\theta_{T-4}^{(2)}\right) \in \left(-\pi/2,\pi/2\right)^2$. Like in all cases before the integral is readily done by substituting for sinuses of those angles. We have: \begin{eqnarray} \frac{1}{6} \frac{(2 \pi)^4}{(r_1 r_2)^3} \cdot \prod\limits_{l=1}^{T-5} \cos(\theta_l^{(1)})^{T-l-4} \cos(\theta_l^{(2)})^{T-l-4} \cdot \left( \left(r_1 r_2\prod\limits_{l=1}^{T-5} \cos(\theta_l^{(1)}) \cos(\theta_l^{(2)})\right)^2 - \left(c_{1,2} - r_1 r_2\sum\limits_{p=6}^T \sin(\theta_{T-p+1}^{(1)}) \sin(\theta_{T-p+1}^{(2)}) \cdot \prod\limits_{l=1}^{T-p} \cos(\theta_l^{(1)}) \cos(\theta_l^{(2)})\right)^2 \right)^1 \end{eqnarray} Since we assumed that $T=5$ the above expression does not depend on any angles anymore and it simply reads: \begin{equation} \frac{1}{6} \frac{(2 \pi)^4}{(r_1 r_2)^3} \cdot \left((r_1 r_2)^2 - c_{1,2}^2\right) \end{equation} After combining the expression above with the term $\prod\limits_{j=1}^2 r_j^{T-1} \delta\left(c_{j,j} - r_j^2\right)$ and integrating over the radiuses we get: \begin{equation} \omega^{(5)}({\bf c}) = \frac{2}{3} \pi^4 \det({\bf c}) \end{equation} From the derivation above it is clearly seen that the generic result will be: \begin{equation} \omega^{(T)}({\bf c}) = \frac{2^{T-3}}{(T-2)!} \pi^{T-1} \det({\bf c})^{\frac{T-3}{2}} \end{equation} for $T\ge 3$.

share|improve this answer

Below is the result for $T=2$. We have: \begin{eqnarray} \int\limits_{{\mathcal R}^4} \delta\left(c_{1,1} - x_{1,1}^2 - x_{1,2}^2\right) \delta\left(c_{2,2} - x_{2,1}^2 - x_{2,2}^2\right) \delta\left(c_{1,2} - x_{1,1}x_{2,1} - x_{1,2}x_{2,2}\right) d x_{1,1} d x_{1,2} d x_{2,1} d x_{2,2} = \\ \int\limits_{{\mathcal R}^3} \delta\left(c_{1,1} x_{2,1}^2 - \left({c_{1,2} - x_{1,2} x_{2 2}}\right)^2 - x_{1,2}^2 x_{2,1}^2\right) \delta\left(c_{2,2} - x_{2,1}^2 - x_{2,2}^2\right) {x_{2,1}}d x_{1,2} d x_{2,1} d x_{2,2} = \\ \frac{1}{2} \int\limits_{{\mathcal R}^2} \delta\left((c_{1,1}-x_{1,2}^2)(c_{2,2}-x_{2,2}^2) - (c_{1,2}-x_{1,2} x_{2,})^2\right) d x_{1,2} d x_{2,2} = \\ \frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{\det(c)} \int\limits_{{\mathcal R}^2} \delta\left(1 - \vec{x}^T c^{-1} \vec{x}\right) d^2 x = \\ \frac{\pi}{2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{\det(c)}} \end{eqnarray} In the second line we have integrated over $x_{1,1}$ using the definition of the delta function.In the third line we integrated over $x_{2,1}$.In the fourth line we took out the determinant from the inside of the delta function and we wrote the remaining terms as a quadratic form.Finally, we diagonalized the quadratic form and computed the integral by going to radial coordinates.

share|improve this answer
Not entirely convinced about that integration over $x_{2,1}$ since it involved a product of $\delta's$ which each contain $x_{2,1}$. But I'll add my computation of the $T=2$ case to my answer for comparison. –  Semiclassical Aug 19 at 17:19
I think I see an error which (taking into account the mistake I made in my answer) will make our answers match: When you do the integration over $x_{2,1}$, you do pick up a factor of $\frac12$ from the quadratic argument of the $\delta$-function, but you also get a factor of $2$ overall because $x_{2,1}$ can be positive or negative. (This doesn't show up in radial calculations because $r<0$ isn't integrated, but it's definitely present in Cartesian coordinates.) So I think your answer should be $\pi / \sqrt{\det(\mathbf{c})}$. –  Semiclassical Aug 19 at 19:52
@Semiclassical: Thank you very much for all those comments. In other words you are saying that $\int\limits_{\mathcal R} f(x) \delta(x^2 - a) 2 x d x = \sum\limits_{\epsilon=\pm} f(\epsilon \sqrt{a})$. In my calculation over $x_{2,1}$ I have taken the $\epsilon=+$ term only. As such the result should be bigger by a factor of two. –  Przemo Aug 20 at 9:44
Right. I didn't run into that subtlety in my answers because I always worked in spherical coordinates; on the other hand, I forgot the factors of $1/2$ from the first two $\delta$-functions. So that gave an overall factor of $8$ discrepancy between our answers. I've since fixed that in my first answer, and so have been able to get a rather nice looking final result (though I still need to translate it a bit). –  Semiclassical Aug 20 at 13:46
@Semiclassical: That is great. I think that the final answer is $\frac{2^{T-3}}{(T-2)!} \pi^{T-1} \det({\bf c})^{\frac{T-3}{2}}$ for $T\ge 3$. I am looking forward to seeing your result :). –  Przemo Aug 20 at 13:50

For comparison with Przemo's additional answer, here is my calculation of the $T=2$ case. I'll compute in polar coordinates from the start:

$$\omega^{(2)}=\frac{1}{4}\int\limits_0^\infty d(r_1^2)\int\limits_{-\pi}^{\pi} d\phi_1\int\limits_0^\infty d(r_2^2)\int\limits_{-\pi}^{\pi} d\phi_2 \;\delta(c_{11}-r_1^2)\;\delta(c_{22}-r_2^2)\;\delta(c_{12}-r_1 r_2 \cos(\phi_2-\phi_1))$$ I've written the area element in a non-standard form to make the next step obvious: Since we're integrating over $r^2$'s, the delta functions simplify the integral to

$$\frac{1}{4}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} d\phi_1 d\phi_2\,\delta(c_{12}-\sqrt{c_{11}c_{22}} \cos(\phi_2-\phi_1))$$

Note that the integrand is periodic, and so we may substitute $\phi=\phi_2+\phi_1$ in place of $\phi_2$ without altering the bounds of integration. But then the delta function doesn't involve $\phi_1$ at all, and we may integrate immediately over $\phi_1$ to obtain

$$\frac{\pi}{2}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} d\phi\,\delta(c_{12}-\sqrt{c_{11}c_{22}} \cos\phi)=\pi \int_{0}^\pi d\phi \,\delta(c_{12}-\sqrt{c_{11}c_{22}}\cos\phi)$$ where we have used the symmetry of the integrand on $[-\pi,\pi]$.The substitution $\mu=c_{12}-\sqrt{c_{11}c_{22}} \cos\phi$ then yields

\begin{align} \pi \int_{c_{12}-\sqrt{c_{11}c_{22}}}^{c_{12}+\sqrt{c_{11}c_{22}}} \frac{\delta(\mu)\,d\mu}{\sqrt{c_{11}c_{22}}\sin\phi(\mu)} &=\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{c_{11}c_{22}}}\cdot\left(1-\frac{c_{12}^2}{c_{11}c_{22}}\right)^{-1/2}\\ &=\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{c_{12}^2-c_{11}c_{22}}}\\&=\pi \det{(\mathbf{c})}^{-1/2} \end{align}

This differs from Przemo's answer---but by a factor of $2$, not $8$. So I'm a bit perplexed.

share|improve this answer
Possible resolution: I think I missed an overall factor of $1/4$ in my answer below (from the first two delta-functions). So that would only leave a single factor of two difference between our answers. @Przemo –  Semiclassical Aug 19 at 18:14

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.