Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Bredon defines bundle projection in the following way:

$\bf13.1.$ Definition. Let $X,B$ and $F$ be Hausdorff spaces and $p:X\to B$ a map. Then $p$ is called a bundle projection with fiber $F$, if each point of $B$ has neighborhood $U$ such that there is a homeomorphism $\phi:U\times F\to p^{-1}(U)$ such that $p(\phi\langle b,y\rangle)=b$ for all $b\in U$ and $y\in F$. That is, on $p^{-1}(U)$, $p$ corresponds to projection $U\times F\to U$. Such a map $\phi$ is called a trivialization of the bundle over $U$.

Then he defines Fibre Bundle

$\bf13.2.$ Definition. Let $K$ be a topological group acting effectively on the Hausdorff space $F$ as a group of homeomorphisms. Let $X$ and $B$ be Hausdorff spaces. By a fiber bundle over the base space $B$ with total space $X$, fiber $F$ and structure group $K$, we mean a bundle projection $p:X\to B$ together with a collection $\Phi$ of trivializations $\phi:U\times F\to p^{-1}(U)$, of $p$ over $U$, called charts over $U$ such that:

  1. each point of $B$ has a neighborhood over which there is a chart in $\Phi$;
  2. if $\phi:U\times F\to p^{-1}(U)$ is in $\Phi$ and $V\subset U$ then the restriction of $\phi$ to $V\times F$ is in $\Phi$;
  3. if $\phi$, $\psi\in\Phi$ are charts over $U$ then there is a map $\theta:U\to K$ such that $\psi\langle u,y\rangle=\phi\langle u,\theta(u)(y)\rangle;$ and
  4. the set $\Phi$ is maximal among collections satisfying 1, 2, and 3.

The he remarks about the condition 3. He says the map $\theta :U \rightarrow K $ exists. The only important thing we demand is the continuity of $\theta$.

And the justification is

$\quad$ Let us investigate the meaning of condition $(3)$ of Definition 13.2. Given charts $\phi$ and $\psi$ over $U$, $\phi^{-1}\psi:U\times F\to U\times F$ is a homeomorphism commuting with the projections to $U$. Thus we can write $$\phi^{-1}\psi\langle u,y\rangle=\langle u,\mu\langle u,y\rangle\rangle,$$ where $$\mu:U\times F\to F$$ is the composition $p_F\circ\phi^{-1}\psi$ with the projection $p_F:U\times F\to F$, and hence is continuous. Then $\theta:U\to K$ is given by $$\theta(u)(y)=\mu\langle u,y\rangle.$$

My confusion is the map $\theta : U \rightarrow K$ is not very clear to me. He defines how $\theta(u)$ will act on an element of $y\in Y$ $\theta(u)(y)=\mu \langle u,y\rangle$. From that why should we get a map from U to K .

I think the effectiveness of the action of $K$ on $F$ is vital. ( I guess one should use the fact $K$ acts on $F$ as same as there is an group homomorphism from $K$ to $\operatorname{Aut}(F)$ and the map is injective because the action is effective.)

share|cite|improve this question

Given $u \in U$ we have defined $\theta(u)$ as a map that takes $y \in F$ to $\mu \langle u,y \rangle \in F$. Thus $\theta(u): F \to F$ certainly belongs to $\operatorname{Maps}(F,F)$, and $\theta : U \to \operatorname{Maps}(F,F)$. What remains to be seen is that the image $\theta(u)$ is in fact a homeomorphism living in $K \subset \operatorname{Maps}(F,F)$, but this is clear since the inverse map is supplied by reversing the roles of $\psi$ and $\phi$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Sorry, but it is not clear to me yet. As I understand $\theta (u)$ will be an element of $Aut(F)$ by reversing the role of $\phi$ and $\psi$ . Now, $K\hookrightarrow Aut(F)$ as the action of $K$ on $F$ is effective. But why Should the $\theta :U \rightarrow Aut(F)$ factors through K – Babai Jul 15 '14 at 14:37
I think the statement is misleading. Actually the definition of Fiber Bundle demands the transition map from $U\rightarrow Aut(F)$ to land inside K. (Remember k sits inside Aut(F), as the action of K on F is effective). One can refer the definition of fiber bundle from Steenrod's "Topology of Fibre Bundles" or from the Lecture notes of James F. Davis and Paul Kirk (Page 78-79). – Babai Aug 6 '14 at 6:35

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.