Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Consider the matrix:

$M = \begin{pmatrix} 8&-3\\ 3&-1 \end{pmatrix}$

What are ways of showing $M$ has infinite order? I guess one is to find a closed form for the powers of $M$, but is there a more elegant way?

share|cite|improve this question
Do you mean, how do you show that $M$ does not have finite multiplicative order? The characteristic polynomial is $x^2 +7x +1$, so not all eigenvalues are roots of unity (the sum of the two roots has complex norm 7, but two roots of unity cannot have a sum with complex norm greater than 2); hence the minimal polynomial cannot divide $x^n-1$ for any $n\gt 0$, so we never have $M^n = I$ for any $n\gt 0$. – Arturo Magidin Nov 29 '11 at 4:02
yes, that no power of $M$ equals the identity matrix. – Learner Nov 29 '11 at 4:03
@Arturo I didn't notice your comment when I wrote the answer. Apologies... – Srivatsan Nov 29 '11 at 4:13
@Srivatsan: No problem. Happens to all of us. – Arturo Magidin Nov 29 '11 at 4:14

One approach is to compute the eigenvalues. Writing the characteristic equation, $\lambda^2 - 7 \lambda + 1 = 0$, we find the eigenvalues $$ \lambda_1 = \frac{7 + 3\sqrt{5}}{2}, \quad \lambda_2 = \frac{7 - 3\sqrt{5}}{2} . $$ Check that $0 < \lambda_2 < 1 < \lambda_1$.

The matrix $A^n$ has eigenvalues $\lambda_1^n$ and $\lambda_2^n$. For any $n \geqslant 1$, we have $0 < \lambda_2^n < 1 < \lambda_1^n$; in particular, $A^n$ cannot be the identity matrix.

share|cite|improve this answer
My first attempt was this: if the determinant of a real matrix is different from $\pm 1$, then $A$ has infinite order. But in this case, the question is framed in such a way to make $\det A = 1$. – Srivatsan Nov 29 '11 at 4:19
+1 Indeed, the determinant seems to have been tailored to not make this exercise too easy. Consequently your eigenvalues must be units of the ring of integers of $\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt5)$. A closer look shows that they are the fourth power of the golden ratio and its reciprocal. – Jyrki Lahtonen Nov 29 '11 at 8:32

The trace of $M$ (which equals the sum of the eigenvalues) is $7$, which means that its two eigenvalues cannot both be roots of unity (since a complex root of unity has complex norm $1$, the sum of two complex roots of unity has norm less than or equal to $2$).

But if $M^k = I$, then $M$ satisfies the polynomial $x^k-1$, which means that the minimal polynomial of $M$ divides $x^k-1$. Since the roots of the minimal polynomial are the (complex) eigenvalues of $M$, a necessary condition for $M$ to have finite order is that its eigenvalues be complex roots of unity. As this is not the case, $M$ cannot have finite order.

share|cite|improve this answer
+1 Nice way to conclude that the roots can't both be roots of unity. – Srivatsan Nov 29 '11 at 4:16

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.