Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I Have a statistic statement here which I need to decide if it's true or false

Statement: "When the sample size is random, there is no way to get an unbiased estimator for the population average."

I think that the statement above is false since the Horvitz–Thompson estimator may be a counter example, but I'm not really sure.

Thanks in advance,

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Suppose the size $N\in\{1,2,3,\ldots\}$ of the sample is a random variable that is independent of the individual randomly chosen observations $X_1,X_2,X_3,\ldots$. Then \begin{align} & \mathbb E \left( \frac 1 N\sum_{n=1}^N X_n \right) = \mathbb E \left( \mathbb E\left( \frac 1 N \sum_{n=1}^N X_n \mid N \right) \right) = \mathbb E\left( \frac 1 N \sum_{n=1}^N \mathbb E(X_n\mid N) \right) \\[12pt] = {} & \mathbb E\left( \frac 1 N N\mathbb E(X_1) \right) = \mathbb E(X_1). \end{align} Thus the same mean in this case is an unbiased estimator of the population mean.

share|cite|improve this answer

Here's one way: flip a coin (independent of the population) and take a random sample of size either $1$ (if Heads) or $2$ (if Tails). The sample mean is an unbiased estimator of the population average.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.