Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am trying to understand the relationship between the wedge product and linear subspace. Let $e_1,\cdots, e_4$ be the standard basis of $\mathbb{R}^4$. The wedge product $$(e_1+2e_2)\wedge (3e_1+e_3+e_4) $$ can be thought of as the oriented linear subspace generated by the vectors $e_1+2e_2$ and $3e_1+e_3+e_4$.

Upon expanding we get $$e_{13}+e_{14}-6e_{12}+2e_{23}+2e_{24},$$ where $e_{ij}=e_i\wedge e_j$. Each $e_{ij}$ can be thought of as the linear subspace spanned by $e_i,e_j$. But what role do the coefficients $1,1,-6,2,2$ play?

share|cite|improve this question
I don't see how it is useful to think of a bivector as a linear subspace of the original space. For example, $\{e_1,e_2\}$ and $\{2e_1,e_2\}$ span the same subspace, but $e_1\wedge e_2$ and $2e_1\wedge e_2$ are different bivectors -- one is twice the size of the other. How would identifying them with subspaces work? – Henning Makholm Nov 27 '11 at 22:23
The identification is not one to one. In your example, the two wedge products correspond to same linear subspace. – TCL Nov 27 '11 at 22:31
$v_1\wedge v_2$ is a basis for a linear subspace of $\wedge^2 \mathbb R^4$, not for a subspace of $\mathbb R^4$ itself. – Grumpy Parsnip Nov 27 '11 at 22:33
From a book by Frank Morgan: The oriented m-planes through the origin in $\mathbb{R}^n$ are in one-to-one correspondence with the unit, simple m-vectors in $\wedge^m\mathbb{R}^n$. – TCL Nov 27 '11 at 22:46
@TCL: Ah, "simple" is the operative word. – Grumpy Parsnip Nov 27 '11 at 23:04

As you mention in the comments, there is a 1-1 correspondence between subspaces and unit simple $m$-vectors in $\wedge^m\mathbb R^n$. When you expand out $v_1\wedge v_2$ in a basis, the result is no longer a simple $2$-vector but a linear combination of simple $2$-vectors, so you should not try to interpret the coefficients of this expansion as having geometric meaning.

share|cite|improve this answer

These coefficients are called Plucker coordinates. There are many ways of thinking about them; the following is perhaps the most geometric.

Take your linear space (the span of $e_1+2e_2$ and $3e_1+e_3+e_4$) and project it onto $\mathrm{Span}(e_1, e_2)$. Then this linear map reduces area by a factor of $$\frac{6}{\sqrt{1^2+1^2+6^2+2^2+2^2+0^2}}.$$ If you project onto $\mathrm{Span}(e_1, e_3)$ instead, then the numerator changes to $1$ (the coefficient of $e_1 \wedge e_3$) and the denominator stays the same. The sign of the Plucker coordinate tells you whether the projection is orientation preserving or reversing.

Note: I am using the inner product on $\mathbb{R}^4$ to measure areas. Without this, I could still make sense of a ratio of two Plucker coordiantes, but there wouldn't be a good way to interpret one Plucker coordinate by itself.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.