# Exact definition of convergence

Let us consider a sequence $x_n$. Now let it converge to a limit $L$. Now which one of the following is the correct definition of convergence?

1. A sequence $x_n$ is said to be convergent to a limit $L$ if given any integer $n$ there exists a positive real number $\epsilon$ such that for all $M\gt n$, $|x_M-L|\lt\epsilon$.

2. A sequence $x_n$ is said to be convergent to a limit $L$ if given any real positive number $\epsilon$ there exists an integer $n$ such that for all $M\gt n$, $|x_M-L|\lt\epsilon$.

If the two definitions are equivalent then how to prove it?

-
You overuse commas a little bit... – Arturo Magidin Nov 27 '11 at 18:43

For example, the sequence $x_n = (-1)^n$ satisfies your first definition with both $L=1$ and $L=-1$: given any $n\gt 0$, let $\epsilon=3$. Then for every $M\gt n$ we have $|x_M-1|\lt 3$ and $|x_M+1|\lt 3$.
In fact, your first definition is satisfied by any bounded sequence (in particular, any convergent sequence) with any value of $L$. If you suspect that convergent sequences should have only one limit, that should be tip-off that the first definition is incorrect.