Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let us consider a sequence $x_n$. Now let it converge to a limit $L$. Now which one of the following is the correct definition of convergence?

  1. A sequence $x_n$ is said to be convergent to a limit $L$ if given any integer $n$ there exists a positive real number $\epsilon$ such that for all $M\gt n$, $|x_M-L|\lt\epsilon$.

  2. A sequence $x_n$ is said to be convergent to a limit $L$ if given any real positive number $\epsilon$ there exists an integer $n$ such that for all $M\gt n$, $|x_M-L|\lt\epsilon$.

If the two definitions are equivalent then how to prove it?

share|cite|improve this question
You overuse commas a little bit... – Arturo Magidin Nov 27 '11 at 18:43
up vote 6 down vote accepted

The second definition is correct; the first definition is incorrect.

For example, the sequence $x_n = (-1)^n$ satisfies your first definition with both $L=1$ and $L=-1$: given any $n\gt 0$, let $\epsilon=3$. Then for every $M\gt n$ we have $|x_M-1|\lt 3$ and $|x_M+1|\lt 3$.

In fact, your first definition is satisfied by any bounded sequence (in particular, any convergent sequence) with any value of $L$. If you suspect that convergent sequences should have only one limit, that should be tip-off that the first definition is incorrect.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you, sir. – user16186 Nov 28 '11 at 3:06

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.