Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A construction that I've been finding all over the place in studying the category of NF (Quine's New Foundations) sets and functions is a situation like the following: there's a functor $T:\mathbf{C}\to \mathbf{Set_{NF}}$ and a functor $F:\mathbf{D}\to \mathbf{Set_{NF}}$ such that for all $c\in\mathbf{C}$ there exists a universal arrow $\langle \sigma_c, d_c\rangle$ from $Tc$ to $F$ (i.e. $(Tc\downarrow F)$ has an initial object). In the wild, $T$ is usually an endofunctor, and $F$ is a functor you would expect to have a left adjoint in standard set theories. The effect is that some universal construction is only really defined on objects in the image of $T$.

If I haven't screwed up, it looks like this means one can define a functor $H:\mathbf{C}\to \mathbf{D}$ such that the above universal arrows form the components of a natural transformation $\sigma: T\to FH$. Moreover, it looks like $\langle \sigma, H\rangle$ form a universal arrow from $T$ to $F^{\mathbf{C}}:\mathbf{D^C}\to\mathbf{Set_{NF}^C}$; sort of like a Kan extension turned on its head.

Question Time: Besides "are my conclusions correct," I'm wondering if this is an instance of something well-studied, and if there are any good references on that something.

Apologies if this has a painfully obvious answer, or if the question has come out unclear.

share|improve this question
    
What does NF mean? –  Martin Brandenburg Jul 5 at 19:27
    
Sorry, Quine's New Foundations set theory. –  Malice Vidrine Jul 5 at 20:18
    
Do you have an example of when this happens that isn't specific to NF? –  Qiaochu Yuan Jul 5 at 23:00
    
@Qiaochu: Well, when the $T$ in the above example is the identity, it's just an adjunction. Besides that, I cannot think of any examples where $T$ is something non-trivial. –  Malice Vidrine Jul 6 at 0:07
    
(Well, no non-trivial examples outside NF, that is.) –  Malice Vidrine Jul 6 at 0:31

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

What I have described above, somewhat idiosyncratically, is a relative adjoint. Specifically, $F$ is a functor with a $T$-relative left adjoint.

Moreover the "Kan extension turned on its head" is a Kan lift.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.