Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Largely I want to know as to how does one say anything about the hyperellipticity or the genus of the Riemann surface by looking at the algebraic curve and its singularities.


  • To give a specific example, what is the meaning of the statement that, "a curve of genus 2 can be expressed as a fourth degree plane curve possessing one double point" ?

Does this mean that any Riemann surface of genus 2 is a normalization of a fourth degree algebraic curve in $\mathbb{P}^2$ with one double point?

In general the proof says that any compact hyperelliptic Riemann surface of genus $g$ is a normalization of a an algebraic curve of degree $2g+2$ of the form $y^2 = \prod _{i = 1}^{2g+2} (x-a_i)$

So I would have naively thought that a genus $2$ Riemann surface (which is always hyperelliptic) will need a $2\times 2 +2 = 6$ degree algebraic curve. Hence I am not clear as to what to read of the quoted statement. Is something very special happening for genus $2$? Is the general theorem not a sharp statement?

  • The general statement seems to tell me that the $a_i$ being distinct guarantees the smoothness of the algebraic curve except may be at the points at infinity. Now if there is a lower degree curve that can equally well represent the genus $2$ surface then is that necessarily going to be a curve with singularities?

  • If the general statement is not a sharp statement and one can in cases do with lower degree curves than $2g+2$ then how does one derive the genus of the Riemann surface by looking at the algebraic curve and may be its singularities. Is there a "generalized" genus formula that works always?

share|improve this question
    
I recommend the book Riemann Surfaces by Farkas and Kra, it has a lot of the answers to your questions. If that is too advanced, Miranda's book answers some of these questions, but not as well IMO –  AnonymousCoward Nov 25 '11 at 20:27
    
@GottfriedLeibniz I currently have access to only the book on Riemann surfaces by Griffiths. Thats the book that I am reading. It would be great if you can sketch the argument or give enough hints on these matters on which I can build on. –  Anirbit Nov 25 '11 at 21:10

1 Answer 1

A smooth degree $4$ plane curve has genus $3$. If you now degenerate this curve so that it obtains one ordinary double point, this corresponds to pinching off one loop on the genus $3$ Riemann surface. If you visualize this, you will see that it now looks like a genus $2$ Riemann surface with two points identified. Desingularizing this, you obtain a genus $2$ curve.

Now hyperelliptic curves are also traditionally represented as $y^2 = f(x)$, where $f(x)$ has degree $2g+1$ or $2g+2$. When the degree is $> 3$, these are singular equations, but the singularity is not an ordinary double point. So this is simply a different way of representing a hyperelliptic curve (which also puts the hyperelliptic involution in evidence: it is the map $(x,y) \mapsto (x,-y)$). Note that in the model of the first paragraph, the hyperelliptic involution is not so evident.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the answer but I am not clear about many of the things that you are seeing. Though I can see your intuition about the pinching of the genus - I don't see how the guaranteed degree 6 curve is related to this claimed degree 4 curve apparently describing the same genus 2 surface. Can you elaborate more on this? Also I did not completely get your point about degree > 3 being singular equations - I though we had already proven that the distinctness of $a_i$ makes the curve smooth as a variety. And how does the hyperelliptic involution play into this? –  Anirbit Nov 26 '11 at 17:58
    
@Anirbit: Dear Anirbit, The singularity when deg $> 3$ is at infinity. As for how the degree $4$ curve relates to the degree $6$ one, there is some (non-linear) change of coordinates that relates them; I don't know it off the top off my head. If you want to find it, you should look for the hyperelliptic involution of the degree $4$ curve; I don't know how to describe it off the top of my head either. Regards, –  Matt E Nov 26 '11 at 19:49
    
Thanks for your reply. I am finding it to be very non-intuitive that a change of coordinates can change the degree of the curve! I don't know how to go about looking for the hyperelliptic involution of degree 4 curve when I don't even know that curve. All I have is that degree 6 curve. May be you can also see this other question of mine where I have gone into some more details of the associated things that I am stuck with - math.stackexchange.com/questions/85834/… –  Anirbit Nov 26 '11 at 21:05

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.