Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can we completely classify the simply-connected surfaces (with or without boundary) in $\mathbb R^3$ up to homeomorphism?

share|cite|improve this question
Relevant (and almost a duplicate):… – Jesse Madnick Nov 26 '11 at 1:35

The classification of surfaces is well-known. Every surface is homeomorphic to either $mT+nD$ or $mP+nD$ where $T$ is a torus, $P$ is a projective plane, $D$ is a disk, $m,n$ are non-negative integers, and $+$ is connected sum.

Now you want the surfaces to be in ${\bf R}^3$, so that rules out $mP$ for $m\ge1$.

You also want them simply-connected. That rules out $mT+nD$ for $m\ge1$ and $mP+nD$ for $m\ge1$ and $nD$ for $n\ge2$, leaving only two surfaces: the sphere, and the disk.

share|cite|improve this answer
This is only for compact surfaces. What about noncompact ones? – Damian Sobota Nov 25 '11 at 23:32
Ah, I wondered if that was what OP was getting at. Those are beyond me. See Ian Richards, On the classification of noncompact surfaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 106 (1963) 259-269. There is some discussion of the Richards result at… – Gerry Myerson Nov 26 '11 at 0:08
The OP might also want surfaces with boundary. – Jesse Madnick Nov 26 '11 at 1:34
@JesseMadnick, compact surfaces with boundary are already taken care of - the $D$ terms in the connected sums are the boundaries. Noncompact surfaces with boundary I leave to those better informed than myself. – Gerry Myerson Nov 26 '11 at 1:59
@GerryMyerson Ah, right, sorry, it didn't occur to me that $D$ is a closed disk. – Jesse Madnick Nov 26 '11 at 3:06

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.