Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Theorem: if $R,S$ are integral domains, $R\subset S$, and where $s_{1},...,s_{n}$ in $R_{S}$. Then there is a $m\in \mathbb{N}$ and $t_{1},..., t_{m}$ in $S$ (not all 0) so that $s_{i}N\subset N $ ($i=1,...,n)$ where $N=t_{1}R+...t_{m}R$

I was ill yesterday and could not attend the lecture (where it was shown). Does anybody know where I can find a proof of this theorem on the internet or a book? Or does anybody know how to show this and is willing to write it here? Thanks.

I will post now the proof that Milne gives for another Theorem but I fail to use for the theorem of my lecturer:

Proposition 5.1. Let A be a subring of a ring B. An element $\alpha$ of B is integral over A if and only if there exists a faithful (i.e. if $a M = 0 $ then this implies $a=0$) $A[\alpha]$ submodule M of B that is finitely generated as an A-module.

Proof $\Rightarrow$ : Suppose $$\alpha ^{n} + a_{1}\alpha^{n-1}+\cdots+a_{n}=0 $$
Then the A-submodule M of B generated by $1,\alpha,\ldots,\alpha^{n-1}$ has the property that $\alpha M \subset M$, and it is faithful because it contains 1 .
$\Leftarrow : $ Let M be an A-module in B with a finite set $\{e_{1},\ldots,e_{n}\}$ of generators such that $\alpha M \subset M $ is faithful as an $A[\alpha]$ module. Then, for each i, $$\alpha e_{i} = \sum a_{ij}e_{j}; \text{ for some }a_{ij} \in A $$

We can rewrite this system of equations as : $$\begin{align*} (\alpha-a_{11}e_{1}-a_{12}e_{2}-a_{13}e_{3}-\cdots &=0\\ -a_{21}e_{1}+(\alpha - a_{22})e_{2}- a_{23}e_{3}- \cdots&= 0\\ \cdots &=0 \end{align*}$$
Let $C$ be the matrix of coefficients on the left-hand side. Then Cramers formula tells us that $\det (C)e_{i}=0$ for all $i$. As $M$ is faithful and the $e_{i}$ generate $M$, this implies that $\det(C)=0$. On expanding out the determinant, we obtain an equation:
$$\alpha^{n} + c_{1}\alpha^{n-1} + c_{2}\alpha^{n-2} + \cdots+ c_{n} = 0 ,\qquad c_{i} \in A$$

From this proof of the Proposition, can anybody please tell me the proof for the theorem of the lecturer?

share|cite|improve this question
Sorry, but what do you mean by $R_S$? – Knumber10 Nov 24 '11 at 15:21
Sorry, I don't know that for sure. For $\mathbb{Z}_{\mathbb{C}}$ it means the ring of an integer over $\mathbb{C}$. – SonGohan Nov 24 '11 at 15:41

For proofs like this, I think it's good to consider a single $s_1 = s$ first. I assume that for you $s \in S$ being integral over $R$ means that (INT 1) $s$ is a root of a monic polynomial with coefficients in $R$. But it is equivalent to require (we need another adjective if $S$ is not a domain) the following.

(INT 2) There exists a non-zero finitely generated $R$-submodule $M$ of $S$ such that $sM \subset M$.

I hope it's clear that (INT 2) is your desired statement for $n = 1$. The equivalence of these is well-known and is, for example, Proposition 5.1 of Milne's commutative algebra notes. Proving that (INT 1) implies (INT 2), which is all you need, is the easier direction: if $s$ satisfies \[ s^k + r_{k - 1}s^{k - 1} + \cdots + r_1s + r_0 = 0 \] with $k \geq 1$ and each $r_i \in R$, then $R[s]$ is generated as an $R$-module by $1, \ldots, s^{k - 1}$.

Here are some preliminaries for the general case.

  1. Show that if $M_1, M_2$ are non-zero finitely generated $R$-submodules of $S$, then so is \[ M_1M_2 = \{\sum x_iy_i : x_i \in M_1, y_i \in M_2\}. \] Indeed, if $M_1$ is generated by $u_1, \ldots, u_r$ and $M_2$ is generated by $v_1, \ldots, v_s$, then the $rs$ elements $\{u_iv_j\}$ generate $M_1M_2$ as an $R$-module.

  2. Given $s \in S$, show that if $sM_1 \subset M_1$ then $sM_1M_2 \subset M_1M_2$.

So, if you use (INT 2) for each $s_i$ to get a module $M_i$, then $N = M_1 \cdots M_n$ will do everything you want.

I'll prove the second preliminary exercise, just to show that nothing scary is happening here. I think the proofs are cleaner if you notice that $M_1M_2$ is generated by products, but I will avoid any sort of finesse. Suppose $sM_1 \subset M_1$, and let $\sum_{i = 1}^t x_iy_i$ with $x_i \in M_1$ and $y_i \in M_2$ be an element of $M_1M_2$. If we multiply by $s$, then we get $\sum_{i = 1}^t (sx_i)y_i$. As $sx_i \in sM_1 \subset M_1$, this sum is an element of $M_1M_2$.

share|cite|improve this answer
I am new to R modules, can you please show me how to generalize the proof for this theorem? – SonGohan Nov 24 '11 at 19:43
Sorry, it is not clear to me as to how you have showed the theorem by using the proof on the Subring preposition. – SonGohan Nov 24 '11 at 23:18
I am confused: in your first section you write "... will do the job", then that the existence of such a module exists is the proof of the preposition. Also, you wrote in the second part, that these two properties need to be shown (which to be honest I do not see how to prove) in order for the first part to be true. Could you elaborate on how to prove or even prove these two properties? That would help a lot. Thanks so far, also for the editing. I do not take it for granted. – SonGohan Nov 25 '11 at 0:36
@SonGohan I organized everything and wrote out the second "task". Hope it makes more sense. – Dylan Moreland Nov 25 '11 at 17:16

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.