Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am trying to understand a statement in the paper

I give details below so it should not be necessary to look at the paper.

Suppose $Q$ is an $SU(2)$-bundle over $S^4$ which $S^1$-equivariant, and denote by $E$ the rank 2 complex vector bundle associated to $Q$ via the fundamental representation. Over the fixed point of the circle action on $S^4$, an $S^2$, the circle acts fiber-wise.

The statement I have troubles understanding is the following one (on top of page 812 in the paper):

"Assuming that this action [the $S^1$ action] is non-trivial, we see that $E$ splits over $S^2$ as \begin{equation}\left. E\right|_{S^2}=L\oplus L^*, \end{equation} where $L,L^*\rightarrow S^2$ are line bundles with $S^1$ action. Because the $S^1$ action is by $SU(2)$ transformations, $L$ is the dual of $L^*$."

I cannot see how the fact that the bundle splits is related to the $S^1$ action.

share|cite|improve this question

I have been thinking a bit more on this and I will try to answer my question. I would greatly appreciate some feedback.

First I think one can say that a principal bundle automorphism induces an associated bundle isomorphism. If $Q$ is a principal $G$-bundle, $f\in\mathrm{Aut}(Q)$, $E=Q\times_{\rho}F$ is an associated bundle with fibre $F$, define $\hat f:E\rightarrow E$ via \begin{equation} \hat f([p,u])=[p,\rho(g_f)u], \end{equation} where $[p,u]$ is a point of $E$ and $g_f:Q\rightarrow G$, is the unique $G$-equivariant map such that $f(p)=p\cdot g_f(p)$. By $G$-equivariant I mean that $g_f(p\cdot h)=h^{-1}g_f(p)\,h$ for any $h\in G$, with $\cdot$ the right action of $G$ on $Q$.

Going back to the statement quoted above, the $S^1$ action gives an automorphism on the bundle $\left. Q \right|_{S^2}$ , hence it induces a 2-dimensional representation of $U(1)$ on the $\mathbb{C}^2$ fibres of $\left. E \right|_{S^2}$. This representation must be reducible, hence a priori of the form \begin{equation} \left(\begin{array}{cc} \exp(ip\alpha)&0\\0&\exp(iq\alpha)\end{array}\right), \end{equation} with $p$,$q$ integers. However, since $G=SU(2)$, this must also be an $SU(2)$ representation, hence \begin{equation} q=-p. \end{equation}

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.