Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

First we introduce the following notation: $$ \mathcal{N}_\infty:= \{N\subset \mathbb{N}| \mathbb{N} \text{\ }N \text{ is finite}\} $$ and $$ \mathcal{N}_\infty^\#:= \{N\subset \mathbb{N}| N \text{ is infinite}\} $$ In most textbooks of real analysis, the limit inferior is defined in one of the following two ways: $$ \liminf_n C_n = \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty \bigcap_{m=n}^\infty C_m $$ or $$ \liminf_n C_n = \left\{x \in \mathcal{X} | x\in C_k \text{ ultimately for all } k \right\} $$ We need to show that: $$ \liminf_n C_n = \bigcap_{N\in \mathcal{N}_\infty^\#} \overline{\bigcup_{n\in N}C_n} $$ where the overline denotes the set closure in the respective topology. For the limit superior we need to show that: $$ \limsup_n C_n = \bigcap_{N\in \mathcal{N}_\infty} \overline{\bigcup_{n\in N}C_n} $$ These properties appear in [p.110, 1] as exercises.

[1] R.T. Rockafellar and R. J-B. Wets, "Variational Analysis", Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 317, 1998.

share|improve this question
    
there is already a very similar question. maybe they should be merged –  Glougloubarbaki Nov 22 '11 at 21:41
    
@Glougloubarbaki : If you know a very similar question perhaps you should post it here. –  Patrick Da Silva Nov 22 '11 at 22:00
    
@Pantelis : What have you tried? –  Patrick Da Silva Nov 22 '11 at 22:01
    
@PatrickDaSilva I have tried showing that the one set is included in the other. But I don't see how I should proceed. –  Pantelis Sopasakis Nov 22 '11 at 22:43
1  
I've posted a similar comment to several questions related to this one, but I'll add it here anyway, since it might be relevant. Definition 5.2.1 and Proposition 5.2.2 in Beer: Topologies on closed and closed convex sets seems to be a more general version of this. (He works with nets instead of sequences.) –  Martin Sleziak Nov 23 '11 at 7:48

2 Answers 2

Thanks to Martin Sleziak (for pointing at the book of G. Beer [p.145, Prop. 5.2.2. in 1]) the proof is as follows:

Proposition 1. Let $(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{T})$ be a Hausdorff topological space. Then: $$ \liminf_n C_n = \bigcup_{N\in\mathcal{N}_\infty^\#}\overline{\bigcap_{v\in N}C_v} $$

Proof.

(1). Let $x\in\liminf_n C_n$ and let $\Sigma\in\mathcal{N}_\infty^\#$. Let $W$ be a neighborhood of $x$. There is a $N_0\in\mathbb{N}$ sucht that for all $n\geq N_0$ such that $n\in\Sigma$: $$ W\cap C_n \neq \emptyset $$ Thus, $$ x\in\overline{\bigcup_{n\in\Sigma}C_n} $$ (2). Assume that $x\notin \liminf_n C_n$. Then, there is an open neighborhood of $x$, let $W\ni x$, such that $\Sigma_0:=\{n\in\mathbb{N}| W\cap C_n = \emptyset\}$. Therefore, $x\notin \overline{\bigcup_{n\in\Sigma_0}C_n}$. This completes the proof. $\square$

Note 1: Characterization of the closure of a set: Let $C\subset \mathcal{X}$ and $\bar{C}$ denote its closure which is defined as:

$$ \bar{C}=\bigcap\{F\supset C| F^c\in \mathcal{T}\} $$ Then:

$$ x\in\bar{C} \Leftrightarrow \forall V\in\mathcal{T},\ V\ni x:\ V\cap C \neq \emptyset $$

Note 2: This result is stated in [1] for nets of sets in $\mathcal{X}$, $\{C_n\}_{n\in\Lambda}$ where $\Lambda$ is a partially ordered set. Then the class $\mathcal{N}_\infty^\#$ is replaced by the family of cofinal sets of $\Lambda$. Set set $\Sigma$ is called a cofinal subset of $\Lambda$ if for all $\lambda\in\Lambda,\ \exists\sigma\in\Sigma:\ \sigma\geq\lambda$.

Corollary 2. Let $\{C_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ be a sequence of subsets of $\mathcal{X}$. Then: $$ \bigcap_{n\in\mathbb{N}}C_n \subseteq \overline{\bigcap_{n\in\mathbb{N}}C_n} \subseteq \liminf_n C_n $$

Proof. It follows from Proposition 1 taking $N=\mathbb{N}\in\mathcal{N}_\infty^\#$. $\square$

[1] G. Beer, "Topologies on Closed and Closed Convex Sets", Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN: 0-7923-2531-1.

share|improve this answer
    
You should notice that the definition from Beer is - in the case of sequences - the following: $x\in\liminf A_n$ $\Leftrightarrow$ every neighborhood $U$ of $x$ intersects $A_n$ for all but finitely many $n$'s\\ $x\in\limsup A_n$ $\Leftrightarrow$ every neighborhood $U$ of $x$ intersects $A_n$ for infinitely many $n$'s\\ This is the same as your definition if you work with discerete topology. –  Martin Sleziak Nov 23 '11 at 13:50
    
@MartinSleziak This is easy to prove the two definitions to be equivalent I mentioned (by the way, I found the book), i.e. in a topological space $(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{T})$ let $\mho(x)$ be the family of open neighborhoods of $x$. Then $\liminf_n C_n = \{x|\forall V\in\mho(x),\ \exists N\in \mathcal{N}_\infty, \forall n\in N: C_n\cap V\neq \emptyset\}$. Equivalently: $\liminf_n C_n = \{x|\forall V\in\mho(x),\ \exists N_0\in \mathbb{N}, \forall n\geq N_0: C_n\cap V\neq \emptyset\}$. –  Pantelis Sopasakis Nov 23 '11 at 14:09

I believe the overline you put shouldn't be there ; it has no reason to be. I'll prove what you want to prove without putting it there to prove my point.

I'll do the $\liminf$ case for you, the $\limsup$ case is symmetric. You want to show that $$ \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} \left( \bigcap_{m =n}^{\infty} C_m \right) = \bigcap_{N \in \mathcal N_{\infty}^{\#}} \left( \bigcup_{n \in N} C_n \right). $$ You were right wanting to say that you want to prove $(\subseteq)$ and $(\supseteq)$, but you can make your life more easier a little. To show that $$ \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} \left( \bigcap_{m =n}^{\infty} C_m \right) \subseteq \bigcap_{N \in \mathcal N_{\infty}^{\#}} \left( \bigcup_{n \in N} C_n \right), $$ you only need to show that $$ \forall N \in \mathcal N_{\infty}^{\#}, \qquad \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} \left( \bigcap_{m =n}^{\infty} C_m \right) \subseteq \bigcup_{n \in N} C_n $$ since being in the intersection means being in all of the things you intersect over. Now suppose $$ x \in \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} \left( \bigcap_{m =n}^{\infty} C_m \right) \qquad \Longrightarrow \qquad \exists n \, \text{ s.t. } x \in \bigcap_{m=n}^{\infty} C_m \qquad \Longrightarrow \qquad \forall m \ge n, \quad x \in C_m. $$ Since $N$ is an infinite subset of $\mathbb N$, there exists $m \ge n$ with $m \in N$. Therefore there exists $m \in N$ such that $$ x \in C_m \subseteq \bigcup_{n \in N} C_n, $$ hence we are done with this part.

It's just manipulations of large symbols, don't be astonished by the length of the proof. To show that $$ \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} \left( \bigcap_{m =n}^{\infty} C_m \right) \supseteq \bigcap_{N \in \mathcal N_{\infty}^{\#}} \left( \bigcup_{n \in N} C_n \right), $$ You can restrict yourself to show that $$ x \in \bigcap_{N \in \mathcal N_{\infty}^{\#}} \left( \bigcup_{n \in N} C_n \right) \quad \Longrightarrow \quad \exists n \, \text{ s.t. } \, x \in \bigcap_{m=n}^{\infty} C_m. $$ Consider the set $N_X = \{ m \in \mathbb N \, | \, x \notin C_m \}$. If $N_X \in \mathcal N_{\infty}^{\#}$, we have $$ x \in \bigcap_{N \in \mathcal N_{\infty}^{\#}} \left( \bigcup_{m \in N} C_m \right) \qquad \Longrightarrow \qquad x \in \bigcup_{m \in N_X} C_m, $$ but this is a contradiction because $x$ is (by definition of $N_X$) not in any of those $C_m$'s. Thus $N_X \in N_{\infty}$, and therefore there exists $n \in \mathbb N$ such that for all $m \ge n$, $x \in C_m$. This completes the argument.

Hope that helps,

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.