# Translate a German paper by Hilbert [closed]

Please translate Hilbert's paper Ein Beitrag zur Theorie des Legendre'schen Polynoms. I cannot find an existing translation for it. Thanks:)

-

## closed as off-topic by Andres Caicedo, Davide Giraudo, paul garrett, dragon, achille huiJun 25 '14 at 0:34

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• "This question is not about mathematics, within the scope defined in the help center." – Andres Caicedo, Davide Giraudo, paul garrett, dragon, achille hui
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

That's the kind of task you should be prepared to pay for, or to spend more time researching for a translation, not the kind of task to request of MSE volunteers! (Yes, everyone here volunteers their help!) –  amWhy Jun 24 '14 at 15:30
It's only 5 pages, and not a huge amount of text. If it was 10+ and dense, yeah, it's a little much. But this amounts to only 1.5 ish pages of translatable material. –  Arkamis Jun 24 '14 at 15:32
Go for it, then, @Arkamis! It's all yours! –  amWhy Jun 24 '14 at 15:33
5 pages of math that is a hundred years old, written by one of the trailblazers. Translation is hard work. Also you will be mercilessly criticized if it isn't 100% perfect. –  Peter Sheldrick Jun 24 '14 at 15:35
@JackM If you'll notice, I did not vote to close. Nor did I say the OP was prohibited from posting his/her request. I was "put-off" by the imperative-istic title; the OP seems not to have realized that his/her request is significant, and it would have helped for him/her to acknowledge that, and add just wee-bit of context, perhaps. (How would getting a translation help him/her?, e.g.) I for one, sympathize very easily with the OP's on this site (if you haven't noticed), particularly when a request is written as a request, with a bit of motivation added. –  amWhy Jun 24 '14 at 16:15

Acta mathematica 18, printed April 3rd, 1894

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE THEORY OF THE LEGENDRE POLYNOMIAL

BY

DAVID HILBERT

Königsberg, Prussia

This communication at hand is about the question of the smallest value different from $0$ which the integral

$$I = \int\limits_\alpha^\beta \left[ f(x) \right]^2 \, dx \quad (\beta \gt \alpha)$$

is able to attain, if one chooses for $f(x)$ a polynomial (lit.: "whole rational function") of degree $n - 1$ with integer coefficients and if one understands $\alpha$ and $\beta$ as given constants.

If one sets

$$f(x) = a_1 x^{n - 1} + a_2 x^{n - 2} + \cdots + a_n$$

the integral turns into a positive quadratic form of the $n$ variables $a_1$, $a_2, \ldots, a_n$:

$$I = \sum^{i,k} \alpha_{ik} a_i a_k, \quad (i, k = 1, 2, \ldots, n)$$

whose coefficients are given by the formula

$$\alpha_{ik} = \int\limits_\alpha^\beta x^{2n-i-k} dx = \frac{\beta^{2n-i-k+1}-\alpha^{2n-i-k+1}}{2n-i-k+1}$$

To get an upper bound for the minimum of this quadratic form $I$ it is needed to calculate its discriminant

$$D_{\alpha \beta} = \left| \begin{matrix} \alpha_{11} & \alpha_{12} & \cdots & \alpha_{1n} \\ \alpha_{21} & \alpha_{22} & \cdots & \alpha_{2n} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \alpha_{n1} & \alpha_{n2} & \cdots & \alpha_{nn} \end{matrix} \right| .$$

(end of page 1)

If we replace in this determinant each element by its integral expression and thereby use for all elements of the first horizontal row the integration variable $x = x_1$, for all elements of the $2^{\tiny\mbox{nd}}, \ldots, n^{\tiny\mbox{th}}$ horizontal row regarding the integration variables $x = x_2, \ldots, x_n$, the discriminant of the quadratic form $I$ is represented as $n$-fold integral of the following form:

$$D_{\alpha \beta} = \int\limits_\alpha^\beta \ldots \int\limits_\alpha^\beta x_1^{n-1} x_2^{n-2} \ldots x_n^0 \prod^{i,k}(x_i - x_k) dx_1 \ldots dx_n .$$

The interchange of the $n$ integration variables $x_1,\ldots,x_n$ and the addition of the resulting equations gives

$$D_{\alpha \beta} = \frac{1}{\left|\underline{n}\right.} \int\limits_\alpha^\beta \ldots \int\limits_\alpha^\beta \prod^{i,k} (x_i - x_k)^2 dx_1 \ldots dx_n$$

and if we -- using

$$x_i = \frac{1}{2}(\beta - \alpha) y_i + \frac{1}{2}(\beta + \alpha)$$

introduce the new integration variables $y_1,\ldots,y_n$, we obtain the formula

$$D_{\alpha \beta} = \left( \frac{\beta - \alpha}{2} \right)^{n^2} D,$$

where for abbreviation $D = D_{-1, +1}$ has been set.

For example it follows for $\alpha = 0$, $\beta = 1$

$$D = 2^n \left| \begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & \frac{1}{3} & 0 & \frac{1}{5} & \cdots \\ 0 & \frac{1}{3} & 0 & \frac{1}{5} & 0 & \cdots \\ \frac{1}{3} & 0 & \frac{1}{5} & 0 & \frac{1}{7} & \cdots \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots \end{matrix} \right| = 2^{n^2} \left| \begin{matrix} 1 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{3} & \frac{1}{4} & \cdots & \frac{1}{n} \\ \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{3} & \frac{1}{4} & \frac{1}{5} & \cdots & \frac{1}{n + 1} \\ \frac{1}{3} & \frac{1}{4} & \frac{1}{5} & \frac{1}{6} & \cdots & \frac{1}{n + 2} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \frac{1}{n} & \frac{1}{n+1} & \frac{1}{n+2} & \frac{1}{n+3} & \cdots & \frac{1}{2n - 1} \end{matrix} \right| .$$

(end of page 2)

To calculate $D$ we develop the polynomial (lit.: "whole rational function") $f(x)$ into a progressing series of Legendre polynomials $X_m$. Because of

$$x^m = c_m X_m + c_m' X_{m-1} + \cdots + c_m^{(m)} X_0,$$

where

$$c_m = \frac{\left| \underline{m} \right.}{1 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdots (2m-1)},$$

we get

\begin{align} f(x) &= a_1 (c_{n-1} X_{n-1} + c_{n-1}' X_{n-2} + \cdots) + a_2 (c_{n-2} X_{n-2} + c_{n-2}' X_{n-3} + \cdots) + \cdots \\ &= c_{n-1} a_1 X_{n-1} + (c_{n-1}' a_1 + c_{n-2} a_2) X_{n-2} + (c_{n-1}'' a_1 + c_{n-2}' a_2 + c_{n-3} a_3 X_{n-3}) + \cdots \end{align}

and with the help of the formulas

$$\int\limits_{-1}^{+1} X_m^2 dx = \frac{2}{2m+1}, \quad \int\limits_{-1}^{+1} X_m X_k dx = 0 \quad (m \ne k)$$

it therefore follows

$$\left[ I \right]_{\alpha = -1 \atop \beta = +1} = \int\limits_{-1}^{+1} f^2(x) \, dx = \frac{2}{2n-1} b_1^2 + \frac{2}{2n-3} b_2^2 + \frac{2}{2n-5} b_3^2 + \cdots ,$$

where

\begin{align} b_1 &= c_{n-1} a_1, \\ b_2 &= c_{n-1}' a_1 + c_{n-2} a_2, \\ b_3 &= c_{n-1}'' a_1 + c_{n-2}' a_2 + c_{n-3} a_3, \\ . \,\,\, & . \,\,\, . \,\,\, . \,\,\, . \,\,\, . \,\,\, . \,\,\, . \,\,\, . \,\,\, . \,\,\, . \,\,\, . \,\,\, . \,\,\, . \,\,\, . \end{align}

has been set. Because of this representation as sum of squares of linear forms one wins for the disciminant $D$ the value

\begin{align} D &= \frac{2^n}{1 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \ldots (2n-1)} (c_0 c_1 \cdots c_{n-1})^2 \\ &= 2^{n^2} \frac{\left\{ 1^{n-1} 2^{n-2} \ldots (n-2)^2 (n-1)^1 \right\}^4}{1^{2n-1} 2^{2n-2} \ldots (2n-2)^2 (2n-1)^1} \end{align}

and herein is the right side exactly identical with $\frac{2^{n^2}}{\Delta}$ where $\Delta$ means that value, which I, in my treatise "About the Discriminant of the in the Finite terminating Hypergeometric Series" ("Über die Discriminante der im Endlichen abbrechenden hypergeometrischen Reihe") [1],

[1] Crelle's Journal, Vol. 103, p. 342.

(end of page 3)

got for the discriminant of a $n$-th degree Legendre polynomial under a certain linear transformation. Under consideration of the formula for $D$ stated above, from this follows the result

The discriminant of the quadratic form $\int\limits_0^1 f^2(x)\,dx$ has the value $$\left| \begin{matrix} 1 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{3} & \frac{1}{4} & \cdots & \frac{1}{n} \\ \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{3} & \frac{1}{4} & \frac{1}{5} & \cdots & \frac{1}{n + 1} \\ \frac{1}{3} & \frac{1}{4} & \frac{1}{5} & \frac{1}{6} & \cdots & \frac{1}{n + 2} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \frac{1}{n} & \frac{1}{n+1} & \frac{1}{n+2} & \frac{1}{n+3} & \cdots & \frac{1}{2n - 1} \end{matrix} \right| = \frac{\left\{ 1^{n-1} 2^{n-2} \ldots (n-2)^2 (n-1)^1 \right\}^4}{1^{2n-1} 2^{2n-2} \ldots (2n-2)^2 (2n-1)^1}$$ and is equal to the reciprocal value of the disciminant of the $n^{\tiny\mbox{th}}$ degree equation $$\xi^n + \binom{n}{1}^2 \xi^{n-1} + \binom{n}{2}^2 \xi^{n-2} + \ldots + 1 = 0,$$ whose left side, by a linear transformation of the variable $\xi$, can be turned into the Legendre polynomial $X_n$.

We now return to the original posed question. Application of the Stirling forumla, if $N$ is a positive number, delivers the equation

$$N l 1 + (N-1) l 2 + \ldots + 2 l (N-1) + 1 l N = \frac{1}{2}N^2 l N - \frac{3}{4} N^2 (1 + \varepsilon_N),$$

where $\varepsilon_N$ means a with growing $N$ vanishing number. With the help of this formula one easily finds

$$l D = (1 + \varepsilon_n') l (2^{-n^2}),$$

(end of page 4)

where $\varepsilon_n'$ vanishes with growing $n$, i.e.

$$D = \eta_n 2^{-n^2}$$

and further

$$D_{\alpha \beta} = \eta_n \left( \frac{\beta - \alpha}{4} \right)^{n^2},$$

where $\eta_n$ approaches the unit with growing $n$.

Now it is, according to a theorem by H. Minkowski [2], always possible, for a definite quadratic form, to choose the $n$ variables such that the value of the quadratic form turns out less than the $n$-fold of the $n^{\tiny \mbox{th}}$ root of its discriminant. If therefore the positive difference $\beta - \alpha$ is assumed less than $4$, it follows that it is always possible to determine a polynomial (lit.: "whole rational function") $f(x)$ with integer coefficients for which the value of the integral $I = \int\limits_\alpha^\beta f^2(x)\,dx$ turns out smaller than $n \eta_n' \left( \frac{|\beta - \alpha|}{4} \right)^n$. But because $\eta_n'=\sqrt[n]{\eta_n}$ approaches the unit too with growing $n$, we get the result

The integral $\int\limits_\alpha^\beta f^2(x) \, dx$ can attain an arbitrary small positive value, if one chooses the polynomial (lit.: "whole integer function") $f(x)$ properly, under the condition that the interval of integration $\alpha$ to $\beta$ is smaller than $4$.

Königsberg in Prussia, March 13th, 1893.

[2] Crelle's Journal, Vol. 107, p. 291.

(end of page 5)

(Special thanks to Donald E. Knuth and the MathJax team)

-
A downvote for a work in progress? Come the heck on, people. –  Arkamis Jun 24 '14 at 16:02
Looks good so far, except that the word-for-word translation "whole rational function" should be "polynomial". (And congratulations on handling the archaic spelling; German has undergone two official spelling "reforms" since this paper was written.) –  Andreas Blass Jun 24 '14 at 16:08
I like the phrase "we win the formula". We ought to start using it in English! –  Byron Schmuland Jun 24 '14 at 17:31
Wouldn't it be more accurate to say "is able to attain" than "is possible to attain"? –  Michael Hardy Jun 24 '14 at 17:41
Anyone knows what $\left|\underline{x}\right.$ means? –  mvw Jun 24 '14 at 20:18