Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If a topological space $X$ has $\aleph_1$-calibre and the cardinality of $X$ is $\le 2^{\aleph_0}$, then it must be star countable? A topological space $X$ is said to be star-countable if whenever $\mathscr{U}$ is an open cover of $X$, there is a countable subspace $A$ of $X$ such that $X = \operatorname{St}(A,\mathscr{U})$.

share|improve this question
3  
Surely the soft-question tag is inapplicable here? –  Nate Eldredge Nov 22 '11 at 1:55
1  
Isn't it the same question you asked at MO? mathoverflow.net/questions/80890/… –  Martin Sleziak Nov 22 '11 at 12:55
1  
@Martin: It’s not the same as the original MO question, but it is the same as the revised version. –  Brian M. Scott Nov 22 '11 at 19:40

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

It’s consistent that such a space not be star-countable. Specifically, assume that $2^{\omega_1}=2^\omega=\mathfrak{c}$. Let $D=\{0,1\}$, and let $Y=D^\mathfrak{c}$. For $y\in Y\;$ let $\operatorname{supp}(y)=\{\xi<\mathfrak{c}:y(\xi)=1\}$, the support of $y$, and let $X=\{x\in Y:0<|\operatorname{supp}(x)|\le\omega_1\}$; $|X|=\mathfrak{c}^{\omega_1}=(2^{\omega_1})^{\omega_1}=\mathfrak{c}$.

For any finite partial function $\varphi:\mathfrak{c}\to D$ let $B(\varphi)=\{x\in X:x\upharpoonright\operatorname{dom}\varphi=\varphi\}$; the sets $B(\varphi)$ are a base for the topology on $X$. Let $\{U_\xi:\xi<\omega_1\}$ be a family of open sets in $X$. For $\xi<\omega_1$ let $\varphi_\xi$ be a finite partial function from $\mathfrak{c}$ to $D$ such that $B(\varphi_\xi)\subseteq U_\xi$, and let $D_\xi=\operatorname{dom}\varphi_\xi$. By the delta-system lemma there is an uncountable $\Lambda\subseteq\omega_1$ and a finite $D\subseteq\mathfrak{c}$ such that $D_\xi\cap D_\eta =D$ whenever $\xi,\eta\in \Lambda$ and $\xi\ne\eta$. Since $D$ is finite, there is an uncountable $\Lambda_0\subseteq\Lambda$ such that $\varphi_\xi\upharpoonright D=\varphi_\eta\upharpoonright D$ whenever $\xi,\eta\in\Lambda_0$, and hence $\bigcap\limits_{\xi\in\Lambda_0}U_\xi\supseteq\bigcap\limits_{\xi\in\Lambda_0}B(\varphi_\xi)\ne\varnothing$. Thus, $X$ has calibre $\omega_1$.

Finally, for $\xi<\mathfrak{c}$ let $V_\xi=B(\langle\xi,1\rangle)$; clearly $\mathscr{V}=\{V_\xi:\xi<\mathfrak{c}\}$ is an open cover of $X$. Let $C$ be any countable subset of $X$, and let $S=\bigcup\limits_{x\in C}\operatorname{supp}x$; clearly $|S|\le\omega_1<2^{\omega_1}=\mathfrak{c}$, so there is some $\eta\in\mathfrak{c}\setminus S$. Let $x$ be the unique point of $X$ with support $\{\eta\}$. Suppose that $y\in C\cap V_\xi$. Then $y(\xi)=1$, so $\xi\in S$, $x(\xi)=0$, and $x\notin V_\xi$. Thus, $\operatorname{St}(C,\mathscr{V}\;)\ne X$; and since $C$ was an arbitrary countable subset of $X$, $X$ is not star-countable.

share|improve this answer
    
Brian M. Scott, thanks for your answer. Your answes is aways very helpful for me. The example is very good; X is a subspace of a "good" topological space. –  Paul Nov 25 '11 at 3:22

Under CH the space is separable (hence, star countable ).

Proof(Ofelia). On the contrary, suppose that X is not separable .Under CH write $X = \{ x_\alpha : \alpha \in \omega_1 \}$ and for each $\alpha$ in $\omega_1$ define $U_\alpha$ = the complement of $cl ( { x_\beta : \beta \le \alpha } )$ . The family of the $U_\alpha$ is a decreasing family of non-empty open sets; since $\aleph_1$ is a caliber of X, the intersection of all $U_\alpha$ must be non-empty (contradiction!)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.