4
$\begingroup$

I am wondering if the space $K(\ell^2)$ of compact operators on $\ell^2$ can have a predual.

Thank you in advance for your help.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Please share your thoughts so far :) $\endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Jun 22, 2014 at 13:03
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This question arises from the fact that the dual of K(l^2) is the trace class C_1 which is analogous to the fact that the dual of c_0 is l_1. It is well known that c_0 has no predual. $\endgroup$
    – Pat
    Jun 22, 2014 at 13:28
  • $\begingroup$ Here's a MathJax tutorial :) $\endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Jun 22, 2014 at 13:31
  • $\begingroup$ In this paper, it's shown $K(\ell_2)$ is not even isomorphic to a dual of a Banach space. $\endgroup$ Jun 22, 2014 at 14:14
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much David. I will take a look at it. $\endgroup$
    – Pat
    Jun 22, 2014 at 14:18

3 Answers 3

2
$\begingroup$

Here is an operator theorist's argument.

Assume $K(\ell_2)$ is a dual Banach space. Since $K(\ell_2)$ is a $C^*$-algebra, by Sakai's theorem we have that $K(\ell_2)$ is a von Neumann algebra. Take any $a\in K(\ell_2)$ with infinite dimensional image. Since $K(\ell_2)$ is a von Neumann algebra then there exists an orthogonal projection $p\in K(\ell_2)$ on $\operatorname{Im}(a)$. So $\operatorname{Im}(p)$ is infinite dimensional, which is impossible because $p$ is compact. Contradisction, so $K(\ell_2)$ is not a dual space.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ You are welcome! $\endgroup$
    – Norbert
    Jun 22, 2014 at 15:19
1
$\begingroup$

This is the gist of the argument given in the linked paper in my comment above:

In said paper it is shown that if $H$ is a separable Hilbert space, then $K(H)$ is separable (look at finite-rank operators) and that $K(H)$ contains in isomorphic copy of $c_0$ (fix an orthonormal basis and look at the multiplication operators induced by elements of $c_0$).

$c_0$, however, does not embed in a separable dual space. See, e.g., Kalton and Albiac, Topics in Banach Space Theory, Theorem 6.3.7.

From this, it follows that $K(H)$ is not isomorphic to a dual space if $H$ is separable (in fact, it's not isomorphic to any subspace of a separable dual space).

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much again David. $\endgroup$
    – Pat
    Jun 23, 2014 at 4:53
1
$\begingroup$

Let me give an alternative approach.

Separable dual spaces have the Radon–Nikodym property. The algebra of compact operators on a separable, infinite-dimensional Hilbert space is of course separable. The closed unit ball of a space with the Radon–Nikodym property is the closed convex hull of its extreme points (using a fancy language: Radon–Nikodym property implies the Krein–Milman property).

But wait... an extreme point in the closed unit ball of a C*-algebra must be a partial isometry, so in particular the underlying C*-algebra must have a projection with infinite-dimensional range, which is not the case for $\mathscr{K}(H)$ – there are, thus, no extreme points in the ball of the compacts at all.

$\endgroup$
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .