# Ideal class group of $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-103})$

I want to calculate ideal class group of $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-103})$. By Minkowsky bound every class has an ideal $I$ such that $N(I) \leq 6$. It is enough to consider prime ideals with the same property. Let me denote by $R$ the ring of integers. So we have $2R= (2, \frac{1+\sqrt{-103}}{2})(2, \frac{1-\sqrt{-103}}{2})$, $3R$ and $5R$ are prime. Ideal class group is generated by $P=(2, \frac{1+\sqrt{-103}}{2})$. $N(P)=2$ and thus $P$ is not principal. Absolute norm $N(P^2)=4$ and if $P^2=(a)$ then $(a)=(2)$, but $P^2 \neq 2R$, because $2R=P \overline{P}$, $P \neq \overline{P}$. $N(P^3)$=8 and it is obvious that $P^3$ is not principal. How can I continue this argument for other powers of $P$ and when this stops?

-
$$N\left(\frac{5+\sqrt{-103}}2\right)=\frac{5^2+103}4=32=2^5$$ – Jyrki Lahtonen Nov 21 '11 at 5:19
@Jyrki You might as well post this as an answer. – Alex B. Nov 21 '11 at 5:50
@AlexB. I'm thinking about it, but I need to convince myself first that this implies that the predicted power of $P$ is, indeed, principal. For now it just marks the spot at which the OP's argument based on studying norms of individual elements stops working. If you see, how the rest follows from general principles, go ahead and save me the trouble! I'm done with my morning coffee, and need to commute next... – Jyrki Lahtonen Nov 21 '11 at 6:06
@Jyrki Done.  – Alex B. Nov 21 '11 at 6:59

As Jyrki Lahtonen notes in his comment, the norm of the principal ideal $I=\left(\frac{5+\sqrt{-103}}{2}\right)$ is $2^5$. It will therefore be enough to show that $I=P^5$ or $I=\bar{P}^5$, since 5 is prime and therefore will have to be the exact order of $P$ in the class group.

Now, $P$ and $\bar{P}$ are the only two ideals of $R=\mathbb{Z}\left[\frac{1+\sqrt{-103}}{2}\right]$ above 2. So we immediately know that $I=P^n\bar{P}^{5-n}$ for some $n$ between 0 and 5. But if $n$ is neither 0 nor 5, then $P\bar{P}=2R$ divides (i.e. contains) $I$, which immediately leads to a contradiction, since the generator is not divisible by 2 in $R$. So $I\not\subseteq 2R$, thus $n=0$ or 5 and we are done.

-
+1: Figured this out in the traffic lights :-), thanks! – Jyrki Lahtonen Nov 21 '11 at 7:06

People do not seem to like the quadratic form description of things, but it is the case that, if the discriminant $\Delta$ is negative, the group of binary quadratic forms of discriminant $\Delta$ is isomorphic to the class group of $\mathbb Q(\sqrt \Delta).$ The conditions for this are either $\Delta \equiv 1 \pmod 4$ is squarefree, or $\Delta$ is divisible by 4, $\Delta /4$ is squarefree, and $\Delta /4 \equiv 2,3 \pmod 4.$

For you, $\Delta = -103 \equiv 1 \pmod 4.$ The group of forms, under Gaussian composition, is cyclic of order 5:

jagy@phobeusjunior:~/old drive/home/jagy/Cplusplus$./classGroup Absolute value of discriminant? 103 class number 5 ( 1, 1, 26) ( 2, -1, 13) ( 2, 1, 13) ( 4, -3, 7) ( 4, 3, 7) Each (A,B,C) refers to$A x^2 + B x y + C y^2.$If you had a positive$\Delta,$the congruence restrictions would be the same, we would need to also require that$\Delta$not be a square, and we would be calculating the narrow class group. In this case, if there is an integral solution to$u^2 - \Delta v^2 = -4,$narrow class group and class group agree, so we are done. If there is no solution to$u^2 - \Delta v^2 = -4,$then the class group is the subgroup of squares of the narrow class group. Long story. In this latter case, you are, in effect, keeping the form that represents$1,$but throwing out the (distinct in this case) form that represents$-1.\$

-
Hi Will, do you have any resources you can point to for more information on this take on the class group? – ntropy Nov 11 '14 at 2:33
@ntropy, yes, Jyrki asked me to write a blog post, math.blogoverflow.com/2014/08/23/… and I kept copies of a few pages each from sources I used, when I did not own the book. – Will Jagy Nov 11 '14 at 3:06
@ntropy, meanwhile, my favorite is Binary Quadratic Forms by Duncan A. Buell. also A Course in Computational Algebraic Number Theory by Henri Cohen, and Quadratic Irrationals: An Introduction to Classical Number Theory by Franz Halter-Koch. – Will Jagy Nov 11 '14 at 3:13