Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

From Spivak's Calculus,

For the theorem:

If $f$ is bounded on $[a,b]$, then $f$ is integrable on $[a,b]$ if and only if for every $\varepsilon > 0$ there is a partition $\mathcal{P}$ of $[a,b]$ such that $U( f, \mathcal{P}) - L( f, \mathcal{P}) < \varepsilon.$

Part of the proof is:

If $f$ is integrable sup${L(f, \mathcal{P})}$ $=$ inf $\{U(f, \mathcal{P})\}$.

This means that for each $\varepsilon > 0$ there are partitions $\mathcal{P}', \mathcal{P}"$ with $U(f, \mathcal{P}") - L(f, \mathcal{P}') < \varepsilon $.

I am not getting this part. Could someone explain a little more about how "this means that"?

share|improve this question
    
Can you define your notations? What is $U(f,P)$ and $L(f,P)$? –  Paul Nov 21 '11 at 1:35
    
I'm sorry, I thought these were universal. U(f,P) denotes the upper sum: mathworld.wolfram.com/UpperSum.html. And L, the lower sum –  MathMathCookie Nov 21 '11 at 1:38

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Here is the explanation: By definition, $f$ is integrable if and only if $\sup\{L(f, P)\}= \inf\{U(f, P)\}$, and now we want to prove the only if part of your above statement. Note that the $\sup$ and $\inf$ are taken among all the partitions of the intervals on $[a,b]$. Now by definition of $\sup$, given any any $\epsilon>0$, there exists a partition $P'$ such that $$L(f, P')>\sup\{L(f, P)\}-\frac{\epsilon}{2}.$$ Similarly, be definition of $\inf$, there exists a partition $P''$ such that $$U(f, P'')<\inf\{U(f, P)\}+\frac{\epsilon}{2}.$$ Combining these two inequalities, we have $$U(f, P')-L(f, P'')<\inf\{U(f, P)\}-\sup\{L(f, P)\}+\epsilon=\epsilon$$ since $\sup\{L(f, P)\}= \inf\{U(f, P)\}.$

Moreover, it's easy to check that $U(f, P'\cup P'')\leq U(f, P')$ and $L(f, P'\cup P'')\geq L(f, P'')$. Therefore, we can conclude that $U(f, P'\cup P'')-L(f, P'\cup P'')<\epsilon.$ This proves the only if part of your above statement.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.