Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $G$ be a $k$-regular bipartite graph and let $A$ and $B$ be its partitions. Let $C$ be a component of $G$ and let $C_A = C \cap A$ and $C_B = C \cap B$. I want to prove that $C=K_{k,k}$. Since $G$ is $k$-regular, every vertex in $C_A$ has $k$ neighbors in $C_B$, so $k \le |C_B|$. Similarly $k \le |C_A|$. Now suppose $k < |C_B|$. I am not sure where to go from here.

share|cite|improve this question
I am not sure, but I think you get a counterexample by considering a hexagon, a connected 2-regular bipartite graph with $|A| = 3 = |B|$. – Matthias Klupsch Nov 20 '11 at 16:26
That's a good counterexample. Thanks. – echoone Nov 20 '11 at 16:58
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The claim is equivalent to "the only $k$-regular graphs $G$ are the union of disjoint $K_{k,k}$ subgraphs".

Suppose we have a $k$-regular bipartite graph with $k \geq 2$ formed by the union of $2$ or more disjoint $K_{k,k}$ subgraphs. Suppose $AB$ is an edge in one $K_{k,k}$ and $CD$ is an edge in another $K_{k,k}$. Then we can delete these edges, and replace them by $AD$ and $CB$. This gives a $k$-regular bipartite graph with a component that does not satisfy the claim (it has $2 \times 2k$ vertices, but only $2k^2$ edges).

So, the claim is true if and only if $k=1$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.