Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Rationals can't solve $x^2=2$, and reals can't solve $x^2=-1$. Is there any problem that cannot be solved by complex numbers but can be solved by non-standard numbers?

Every polynomial with coefficients in $C$ can be solved by numbers in $C$, can every equation* be solved by numbers in $C$?

*(that can not be simplified to $1=0$)

share|cite|improve this question
Your first Q's A depends on how you define a number since you already know C. Your 2nd Q: yes, because C is a field and if manipulations are also defined in this field. – puresky Nov 19 '11 at 15:53
Certainly not every equation has a solution in $\mathbb{C}$. As a trivial example, $1=2$, or to make it look more like an equation in a variable, $z+1-z=2$. As a less trivial example, consider $z \bar{z} = -1$. – Nate Eldredge Nov 19 '11 at 16:20
The equation $e^z=0$ cannot be "simplified" to $1=0$, but it doesn't have any solutions in $\mathbb{C}$. – Zev Chonoles Nov 19 '11 at 19:07
@ZevChonoles The equation $e^z=0$ can be "simplified" by multiplication with $e^{-z}$. Guess what you get... – Thomas Klimpel Nov 19 '11 at 19:50
@Thomas: That's true, but as long as we're playing that game, the statement that an equation $f(z)=0$ can't be solved is then equivalent to the statement that $1=0$, since $f$ has no zeros and is therefore invertible. Wouldn't you agree that there is at least content in the statement that there is no solution to $e^z=0$? – Zev Chonoles Nov 19 '11 at 20:18

As $\mathbb{C}$ is commutative, non-commutative problems cannot be solved in it.

E.g. $A \cdot B - B \cdot A = I.$

Equations like this are central to Quantum Mechanics and Lie Algebras.

However, matrices usually are non-commutative, so matrices over $\mathbb{C}$ or $\mathbb{R}$ are able to solve those equations. As can quaternions among others.

EDIT: You say that you are looking for non-standard numbers. May I suggest to have a look at Quaternions? They are the logical next step after $\mathbb{C}$. The Wikipedia entry might be a good starting point. Quaternions are a bit out of fashion, but theoretically and historically they are important.

share|cite|improve this answer
This is precisely 0=I – TROLLKILLER Nov 20 '11 at 18:41
@hyperion It's only 0=I when AB = BA. When something is non-commutative, one cannot assume that AB = BA anymore. – Sjoerd Nov 20 '11 at 19:52

The problem, "find a number strictly greater than zero but strictly less than every number $1/n$ with $n=1,2,3,\dots$" cannot be solved in the complex numbers, but can be solved in the non-standard numbers.

share|cite|improve this answer
I don't quite get this example, since there is no well-ordering of the complex numbers. – akkkk Dec 3 '12 at 11:13
Perhaps I should have put it this way: the problem can't be solved in the reals, and it doesn't help any to extend to the complex numbers, but it can be solved in the non-standard numbers. Or this way: find a number whose modulus is strictly greater than zero but.... – Gerry Myerson Dec 3 '12 at 11:36

I would like to respond to the question "Is there any problem that cannot be solved by complex numbers but can be solved by non-standard numbers?" Since one of the tags is "nonstandard analysis", I will interpret this as applying the the nonstandard numbers in that theory, namely the hyperreals. Back to the question: one important problem that the hyperreals allow one to solve, is relating the derivative of a function to ratios of infinitesimals, as it was done by Leibniz, a co-founder of infinitesimal calculus.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.