Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

For a 3x3 matrix $C$, it is given that


I am then required to prove that $C$ is invertible.

I have attempted a proof, below, but I am not sure it is valid or if there is a better solution.

Attempted proof

$$C^3 + I = 3C^2 - C$$ $$I = - C^3 +3C^2-C$$

If it is assumed that $C^{-1}$ exists then

$$I = C^{-1}(-C^4+3C^3-C^2)$$ If $C^{-1}$ is defined, then $I=C^{-1}C$; therefore test whether

$$C \stackrel{!}{=} -C^4 + 3C^3 - C^2$$ $$ 0 = -C^4 + 3C^3 - C^2 - C$$ $$ C = 0, 1, 1\pm\sqrt{2}$$

Is this at all in the right direction?

share|cite|improve this question
$C$ is a matrix, how can it be $0,1,1\pm \sqrt{2}$? – vadim123 Jun 13 '14 at 22:46

6 Answers 6

up vote 17 down vote accepted

Note that $$ I=-C^3+3C^2-C=C(-C^2+3C-I) $$ Hence $C$ is invertible and $C^{-1}=-C^2+3C-I$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Subtract to get $$I=-C^3+3C^2-C$$ Then factor to get $$I=C(-C^2+3C-I)$$ Now you have $I=CD$, for $D=-C^2+3C-I$. Hence $C$ is invertible.

share|cite|improve this answer

$$C^3+I=3C^2-C$$ $$I=-C^3-3C^2-C$$ $$\det(I)=\det(-C^3+3C^2-C)=\det(C)\det(-C^2+3C-I)$$ Assume $C$ is not invertible, i.e. $\det(C)=0$, then from the previous equation you would obtain $\det(I)=0$, that is a contradiction, since $\det(I)=1$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Quick clean and efficient; I love this. – Geoff Naylor Jun 14 '14 at 0:57
Why prove by contradiction? – Tim Seguine Jun 14 '14 at 10:36
@GeoffNaylor That's a very roundabout way of proving invertibility. Brian's answer is more direct. – Jubobs Jun 14 '14 at 15:23

If $C$ is not invertible, it has a non-trivial null space and hence a non-trivial eigenvector $v$ with eigenvalue $\lambda=0$.

We have $(C^3+I)v=(3C^2-C)v$ whence $(\lambda^3+1)v=(3\lambda^2-\lambda)v$ and setting $\lambda=0$ we see that $v=0$, which is a contradiction.

Easiest (and in fact more general) to use the explicit inverse in the other answers, but this is a way to use the eigenvalues as suggested in your answer.

share|cite|improve this answer

The original assumption implies $C$ annihilates the polynomial $X^3-3X^2+X+1$.

But $X^3-3X^2+X+1=(X-1)(X-\sqrt2-1)(X+\sqrt2-1)$

Therefore, $C$ is diagonalizable, but most importantly its determinant is the product of its eigenvalues, hence $|\det(C)|=1$ and $C$ is invertible.

For the sake of generality, for $n\times n$ matrix, $C$ still annihilates $(X-1)(X-\sqrt2-1)(X+\sqrt2-1)$.

By Primary Decomposition Lemma , $C$ is diagonalizable with eigenvalues $1$, $1-\sqrt{2}$, $1+\sqrt{2}$

Hence it has non-zero determinant.

share|cite|improve this answer

$C$ is a 3x3 matrix, so it's characteristic polynomial is $ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d$.

A matrix is invertible iff it doesn't have a zero eigenvalue, which occurs iff $d \ne 0$.

Every matrix satisfies it's characteristic polynomial.

Your given polynomial is a 3rd degree polynomial with $d \ne 0$, thus the characteristic polynomial is as well, thus $C$ doesn't have an eigenvalue of $0$, thus it is invertible.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.