Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know that $\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{Q}$ is not an $F_\sigma$ set. However, what about $\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{Q}\cap$ Cantor set? Is that an $F_\sigma$?

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

HINT: Let $C$ be the Cantor set. $(\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{Q})\cap C=C\setminus\mathbb{Q}$, which in some ways is a lot like $\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{Q}$. How do you prove that $\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{Q}$ is not an $F_\sigma$? Can you use the same basic idea on $C\setminus\mathbb{Q}$?

share|improve this answer
    
When proving that the irrationals were not an $F_\sigma$ I used the fact that any subset of the reals that is an $F_\sigma$ is either of the first category, or it contains an open interval. So, if I were to adapt that to this case, I'd say that $C\setminus\mathbb{Q}$ contains no intervals, but it's not of the first category, it can't be an $F_\sigma$. Is that argument good, or something along those lines? –  FPP Nov 18 '11 at 12:22
    
@FPP: Yes, that works, provided that you know why $C\setminus\mathbb{Q}$ isn’t first category. –  Brian M. Scott Nov 18 '11 at 12:48
    
I'm not sure why.... If C is of the first category, why would one of its subsets be of the second? Is that possible? –  FPP Nov 18 '11 at 14:10
    
Is there something I'm missing? First of all.... Is $C$ of the first or second category? –  FPP Nov 18 '11 at 14:17
1  
@FPP: You beat me to it: I was just about to point out that category is relative to the ambient space. And yes: $C\setminus\mathbb{Q}$ is a dense $G_\delta$ in $C$, so it’s also a Baire space, and the Baire category theorem still applies. –  Brian M. Scott Nov 18 '11 at 14:33

Do you know the properties of the Cantor set, i.e., is it closed, open, etc? Find out, and that will answer your question.

share|improve this answer
    
Well, I do know that, but I guess I couldn't put it together? I know it's a closed set, I know it's perfect, totally disconnected, of the first category, compact, nowhere dense, etc. I feel like I have a lot of "fun facts" about it, but I can't reach a conclusion from them. –  FPP Nov 18 '11 at 1:31
    
So $\mathbb R- \mathbb Q$ is the complement of an $F_{\sigma}$ , which can be expressed, thru De Morgan, in terms of closed sets, which you can then combine with the closedness of the Cantor set. –  Alphonse Nov 18 '11 at 1:34
    
But after using DeMorgan, I'd end up with an intersection of open sets, the opposite of what I want, right? –  FPP Nov 18 '11 at 1:39
    
Sorry, I meant, start by describing $\mathbb Q$ itself in terms of unions, intersections, etc. , after which De Morgan gives you a description of $\mathbb R- \mathbb Q$ , after which you can compose with the closed Cantor set, and determine what the whole expression is. –  Alphonse Nov 18 '11 at 2:23

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.