Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The question is: Assume $I = [−1, 3]$ and $f : I → R$ is defined by $f(x) = −x^3 + 3x ^2 + 9x$, $x ∈ I$. Find $J = f(I)$, where $f(I)$ is the range of $f$, that is, $f(I) = \{f(x) : x ∈ I\}$. Explain why $f^{−1}: J → R$ exists and why $f^{−1}$ is strictly increasing and continuous on $J$.

So I already found $J$ which is the min and max of $f$ on the interval. What's throwing me off is proving that $f^{−1}$ is strictly increasing and continuous. My argument is that there is a root for $f$ at $x=0$ which is in $J$, which means that $f$ will go to infinite at $0$. So $f$ would not be continuous, but my teacher assures me it is. And when I try to prove that it is strictly increasing, I find that the derivative is less then $0$. Can anyone shed some light on this?

share|improve this question
    
$f^{-1}$ means the inverse of $f$, not the reciprocal of $f$. –  André Nicolas Nov 18 '11 at 1:18
1  
Your argument that $f$ goes infinite at $0$ is based on confusing $f^{-1}$ with $1/f$. $f^{-1}$ is the inverse function, not the reciprocal: it’s the function with the property that for every $x\in I$, $f^{-1}(f(x))=x$, and for every $x\in J$, $f(f^{-1}(x))=x$. Use $f\;'$ to show that $f$ is strictly increasing on $I$ and think about why this means that $f^{-1}$ must be strictly increasing on $J$. –  Brian M. Scott Nov 18 '11 at 1:31
    
That makes sense now. Thank you –  rioneye Nov 18 '11 at 1:42

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

There is no trouble at $x=0$. We are dealing with the inverse function $f^{-1}$, not the reciprocal $\dfrac{1}{f}$.

Use $f'(x)$ (the derivative) to show that $f$ is increasing in your interval. If you do not wish to use the derivative, you can factor out $x$, and do a more complicated analysis. (The reason you may wish to avoid the derivative is if your course is very rigorous and properties of the derivative have not been derived yet.)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.