Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is a follow-up to my last question: Modulus of Continuity. I accidentally asked the wrong question there, so I'm going to start over and hopefully ask the right question.

I'll repeat the relevant definitions. Let $\rho: \mathbb{R}^+ \to \mathbb{R}^+$ be a continuous nondecreasing function such that $\rho(t) = 0$ if and only of $t = 0$. If you can answer my question in the special case $\rho(t) = Ct$ where $C$ is a constant then it will probably be possible to adapt your construction to the general case.

Say that a function $f: X \to \mathbb{R}$ on a metric space has modulus of continuity $\rho$ at a point $x_0 \in X$ if $|f(x) - f(x_0)| \leq \rho(d(x,x_0))$ for every $x \in X$. For example, a function has modulus of continuity $Ct$ at $x_0$ if and only if it is Lipschitz with Lipschitz constant $C$ at $x_0$.

Question If $X$ is a compact metric space without isolated points, is it true that the set of all continuous functions on $X$ which have modulus of continuity $\rho$ at some point of $X$ is nowhere dense in $C(X)$ equipped with the supremum norm?

To prove that the answer is affirmative for a given $X$ one must be able to construct functions of arbitrarily small norm which oscillate arbitrarily rapidly. For example, if $\rho(t) = Ct$ and $X = [0,1]$ then one can use a piecewise linear function such that the slope of each linear piece is larger than $C$ in absolute value. However, I don't see how to generalize this idea to an arbitrary compact metric space without isolated points.

share|improve this question
    
Posted even on Mathoverflow. Here: mathoverflow.net/questions/81508/modulus-of-continuity –  Giuseppe Tortorella Nov 21 '11 at 19:45

2 Answers 2

A detailed answer was posted by fedja on MathOverflow. His main points were:

  • the set of functions that are $\rho$-continuous somewhere is not nowhere dense. In fact it is dense, because every function can be flattened a bit: namely, $(f-a-\epsilon)^+-(f-a)^-+a$ is within $\epsilon$ of $f$ but is flat where $f$ took values between $a$ and $a+\epsilon$.

  • the set of functions that are $\rho$-continuous somewhere is of first category. The key steps are summarized below.


Fix a constant $A$ and consider the set $F_A$ of functions $f$ such that there exists a point $x\in X$ at which $f$ has global modulus of continuity $A\rho $. This set is closed: if $f_n\in F_A$ converge to $f$ uniformly and $x_n\in X$ are the corresponding bad points, then any accumulation point $x$ of the sequence $x_n$ is bad for $f$. Also, it contains no open set, because any function $f \in C(X)$ can be perturbed by small spikes placed along some $\delta$-net in $X$ so as to lose the membership in $F_A$.

share|improve this answer

Try functions such as $f(x) = \min(\epsilon, 2 \rho(d(x,x_0)))$.

share|improve this answer
    
When $\rho(t)=Ct^\alpha$ and $X=[0,1]$, you can try functions like $t^{\alpha/2}$. For arbitrary $\rho$, I imagine you can do something similar, maybe involve $\rho$ in the definition of the function. –  Jeff Nov 17 '11 at 22:22
    
But for which $x_0$? To prove that the set of all functions which have modulus of continuity at some point in $X$ is nowhere dense we must show that for any such function there is a nearby continuous function which fails to have modulus of continuity at any point of $X$. Your function by itself is constant far enough away from $x_0$, and it's not clear how to fix that even by adding up a bunch of functions of the form you describe. –  Paul Siegel Nov 17 '11 at 23:30

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.