Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there any closed form for this expression

$$ \sum_{n=0}^\infty\ln(n+x) $$

share|cite|improve this question
Is obviously $+\infty$ (when defined). – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla Jun 11 '14 at 10:05
log is defined over negative numbers, he never specified this was confined to the Reals. – hedgedandlevered Jun 11 '14 at 17:08
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Write it as $\sum_{n=0}^k \ln(n+x)=\ln\left(\prod_{n=0}^k \left(n+x\right)\right)=\ln\left(\frac{\Gamma(k+x+1)}{\Gamma(x)}\right)$. If $k$ goes to $\infty$ the expression diverges, if $x>0$ or $x$ is not equal to a negative integer.

share|cite|improve this answer

As others correctly mentioned, the expression diverges. Yet, if necessary, you can get quite good asymptotics: $$ \sum_{k=1}^{n} \log (k+x) = \sum_{k=1}^{n} \log k + \sum_{k=1}^{n} \log (1+ \frac{x}{k}) \sim n \log n + \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{x}{k} = n \log n + x \log n \\ =(n+x) \log n $$

share|cite|improve this answer

It's undefined whenever $x\leq 0$, and the series diverges to infinity whenever $x > 0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

A simple way to see why it diverges for $x>0$ is as follows: $$\sum_{n=0}^\infty \ln(n+x) \ge \sum_{n=1}^\infty\ln(1+x) = \infty$$ as an infinite sum of a constant positive argument is always infinite (I have used monotonicity of the logarithm here).

For $x\le 0$, $\ln(0+x)$ is not defined, hence the entire sum is not defined.

share|cite|improve this answer
How about this $$ \sum_{n=1}^\infty \ln(n) = \frac{1}{2}\ln(2\pi) $$ if we add x > 0 to the inside logarithm? – Nguyen Jun 11 '14 at 15:01
I don't understand what's written there. The sum on the left diverges as well. – Bach Jun 11 '14 at 15:38
Hi Bach, I got that from here Is that correct? – Nguyen Jun 11 '14 at 16:36
@Nguyen: from the page you linked: Note that the first two of these are divergent in the classical sense, but converge when interpreted as zeta-regularized sums. – Andrea Corbellini Jun 11 '14 at 17:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.