Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have stumbled across the following exercise on radicals of ideals of rings. I shall show that: $\operatorname{rad}(x+y^2,x^2+2xy^2)$ is a maximal ideal of $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$, but $(x+y^2,x^2+2xy^2)$ is not. How can I show this?

Also, is the radical of a prime ideal equal to the ideal itself? so does $\operatorname{rad}(p)=p$ hold?

And a last question, I shall find a ring $R$ with exactly 17 ideals. My first idea was to take something similar to $\mathbb{Z}/2^{17}\mathbb{Z}$, where the ideals are $(0), (\mathbb{Z}/2^i\mathbb{Z})$ for any $i\le17$. But are those then the only ideals? Is not the union of one ideal with the zero ideal a new ideal? Then it would be difficult to find a Ring with the required number of ideals, wouldn't it?

Thanks in advance for any help!

share|improve this question
3  
The last question has little or nothing to do with the rest; it should really be posted separately. –  Arturo Magidin Nov 15 '11 at 18:14
    
The union of one ideal with the zero ideal is an ideal all right, but not exactly a new one. –  Henning Makholm Nov 15 '11 at 18:19
2  
The ideals if $\mathbb{Z}/2^{17}\mathbb{Z}$ are precisely the ideals of $\mathbb{Z}$ that contain $2^{17}\mathbb{Z}$, which are precisely the ideals generated by divisors of $2^{17}$. Unfortunately, there's 18 of them, not 17. Fortunately, it should be easy to fix. –  Arturo Magidin Nov 15 '11 at 18:24

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Well, the radical of an ideal is the intersection of all the prime ideals containing it (and proving that is a fairly canonical exercise). Thus, if $P\subseteq R$ is a prime ideal, then $rad(P)=P$.

So, let $I=(x+y^2,x^2+2xy^2)\subseteq \mathbb{C}[x,y]=R$. Note that

$x^2+2xy^2-x(x+y^2)=xy^2\in I$, thus $2xy^2\in I$, and hence $x^2\in I$. Therefore, $x\in rad(I)$. Also, $x+y^2-x=y^2\in rad(I)$, implying that $y\in rad(I)$. Therefore, $(x,y)\subseteq rad(I)\subsetneq R$, and since $(x,y)$ is clearly maximal in $R$, $rad(I)=(x,y)$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.