Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Please help me out with this problem:

Let $f_n(x) : [0,1] \to \mathbb R$ be a sequence of continuous functions convergent at every $x \in [0,1]$ to a continuous function $f: [0,1] \to \mathbb R$ . Does $f_n$ converge uniformly to $f$?

My first solution: I read this example in a different question posted earlier and I think it works: Take a sequence $f_n:[0,1] \to \mathbb R$ such that $f_n$ increases linearly from $0$ to $1$ on the interval $\left[ 0,\frac{1}{n} \right]$, decreases linearly from $1$ to $0$ on the intreval $\left[ \frac{1}{n}, \frac{2}{n} \right]$, and is $0$ on $\left[ \frac{2}{n},1 \right]$. Then $f_{n} \to 0$ nonuniformly.

Is this answer true? Also, if anyone can give some examples of such function with detailed proof, I will very appreciative?

share|cite|improve this question
Your example looks reasonable to me. For an even more curious example, make the peak $n$ rather than $1$ and the integral of the $f_n$ is $1$ (for $n\ge 2$) while the integral of the limit $f$ is $0$. – Henry Nov 15 '11 at 0:31
You're given a sequence of functions that converges pointwise to another function. Such a sequence will not necessarily converge uniformly; any book on real analysis will discuss this. (However, uniform convergence does imply pointwise convergence.) – Dimitrije Kostic Nov 15 '11 at 0:33
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Conside the sequence of functions defined by $$f_n(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} n^2x & \mbox{if } 0 \leq x < \frac{1}{n} \\ -n^2\left(x-\frac{2}{n}\right) & \mbox{if } \frac{1}{n} \leq x < \frac{2}{n}\\ 0 & \mbox{if } \frac{2}{n} \leq x \leq 1\\ \end{array} \right.$$ This is a sequence of continuous functions that converge to the continuous function $0$ but not uniformly.

share|cite|improve this answer
Sorry, I don't have time to complete the proof of why is the convergence no uniform. Is not hard using the uniform norm criterion. I will finish when I get home later. I will just leave it there to see if you can prove it. – alejopelaez Nov 15 '11 at 0:39
This is similar to the example given in the question, as mentioned in Henry's comment. – Jonas Meyer Nov 15 '11 at 2:12

The answer is no; Dini's theorem says : if $f_n$ is a sequence defined on a set S, with limit f, where f is continuous, then there are four conditions none of which can be removed for convergence to be uniform (i.e., all four must be satisfied to guarantee that convergence is uniform): 1)${f_n}$ must be continuous, for all n. ii) f itself is continuous on S. iii) The convergence is strictly increasing or strictly-decreasing. iv)S is compact.

And all conditions are necessary (from "Counterexamples"). . Let i'), ii') iii') and iv') be counterexamples for when condition i) fails. Then:

If i) fails:

i') $f_n(x)=0$ if x=0 , or if $\frac{1}{n}<x<1$ , and ,$f_n(x)=1$ otherwise

ii')f(x)=$x^n$ on [0,1]

iii')$f_n(x)$=$2n^2 x$ in $[0,\frac{1}{2n}]$ ; $f_n(x)=n-2n^2(x-\frac{1}{2n})$ , in $[\frac{1}{2n},\frac {1}{n}]$ , and $f_n(x)=0$ otherwise

iv')The sequence ${x^n}$ on $[0,1)$

share|cite|improve this answer
These are not necessary conditions. You mean that (i and ii and iii and iv) is a sufficient condition, and none of these can be omitted. "Necessary conditions" would mean conditions that are always true when the convergence is uniform. – Robert Israel Nov 15 '11 at 1:59
Right, I posted too quickly: none of the four conditions can be omitted, as it is shown in the (counter) examples. – gary Nov 15 '11 at 2:08

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.