Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am facing some confusion about different structures on the open unit disk $D:=\{ z \in \mathbb{C}, |z|<1 \}$. By Riemann Mapping Theorem we know there is just one complex structure on $D$, up to biholomorphism. How about hyperbolic structures (i.e. complete Riemannian metrics with constant sectional curvature $-1$)?

My general understanding of Teichmuller theory (at least for closed surfaces) is that the Teichmuller space $\mathcal{T}(S_{g,n})$ is the universal (orbifold) covering space of the Moduli space $\mathcal{M}(S_{g,n})$ and the covering projection is given by the action of the Mapping class group $Mod(S_{g,n})$. I don't know if this picture is preserved for non closed surfaces.

Maybe I should express my main doubts in two questions:

  1. do we have different hyerbolic structures on $D$? can you provide an example of two non equivalent hyperbolic structures on $D$ (or on the upper-half plane if it's simpler)? I would be happy at least with a "guideline" to distinguish two structures: for example on a closed surface I can distinguish hyperbolic structures via the length of closed geodesics; but there's not such a thing in $D$.

  2. If the answer to the previous question is positive, how can I reconcile the general picture sketched above for closed surfaces $Mod(S_{g,n}) \curvearrowright \mathcal{T}(S_{g,n}) \to \mathcal{M}(S_{g,n})$ in the case of the unit disk, where both $Mod(D)$ and $\mathcal{M}(D)$ are trivial?

Thanks in advance for any comments/suggestion/reference...

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

What you need is the following theorem:

Theorem. Let $(M,g)$ be a simply-connected complete Riemannian $n$-dimensional manifold of the sectional curvature $-1$. Then $(M,g)$ is isometric to the hyperbolic $n$-space.

Similar theorems hold for manifolds of sectional curvature equal to $0$ and to $+1$. You can find a proof in do Carmo's "Riemannian Geometry", which is my favorite introduction to the subject.

Of course, if you drop the completeness requirement, this theorem will be false.

share|improve this answer
    
So of course there is just one structure. What is the right kind of hyperbolic structure to look at to see some flexibility? I think I am looking for relationships with the so called "infinite Teichmuller space". –  Lor Jun 2 at 18:00
2  
It is the same hyperbolic structure, just given an extra data (a quasisymmetric map at infinity). Lehto's book "Univalent functions and Teichmüller spaces" might be a good place to start. –  studiosus Jun 2 at 18:02
    
I see. So this extra data (quasisymmetric map) does not encode anything about the complex/hyperbolic structure of $D$, but is rather an artificial tool used to build a universal object among Teichmuller spaces, right? –  Lor Jun 2 at 18:12
    
Yes, except I would call it not "artifical", but "auxiliary". It is like in the ordinary Teichmuller theory, the main object is not just a compact Riemann surface, but one together with an auxiliary object, a homotopy class of maps from a reference Riemann surface. –  studiosus Jun 2 at 18:15

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.